Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026

08:05
Microtensiometer for Confocal Microscopy Visualization of Dynamic Interfaces
Published on: September 9, 2022
3.0K
Treating London-Dispersion Effects with the Latest Minnesota Density Functionals: Problems and Possible Solutions
1School of Chemistry, The University of Melbourne , Victoria 3010, Australia.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
|January 2, 2016
Summary
Latest Minnesota density functionals fail to accurately describe London-dispersion interactions. Corrections like DFT-D3 show promise but can lead to double-counting, indicating a need for improved theoretical approaches in computational chemistry.
Area of Science:
- Computational Chemistry
- Quantum Chemistry
- Materials Science
Background:
- Accurate description of London-dispersion interactions is crucial for predicting molecular properties.
- Many modern density functionals struggle to capture these long-range van der Waals forces.
- Existing empirical corrections may introduce artifacts like double-counting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of recent Minnesota density functionals regarding London-dispersion interactions.
- To assess the effectiveness of common correction methods like DFT-D3 and VV10.
- To identify inherent limitations in current density functional approximations for dispersion forces.
Main Methods:
- Systematic testing of Minnesota density functionals (SOGGA11, M11-L, N12, MN12-L, SOGGA11-X, M11, N12-SX, MN12-SX).
- Application of Grimme's DFT-D3 correction and the VV10 van der Waals kernel.
- Analysis of dissociation curves, particularly for the argon dimer.
Main Results:
- Minnesota functionals exhibit deficiencies in describing London-dispersion interactions.
- DFT-D3 and VV10 corrections offer partial improvements but can lead to double-counting of electron correlation.
- Unphysical dissociation curves for the argon dimer highlight fundamental issues with these functionals.
- Empirical parameter optimization alone is insufficient without addressing long-range behavior.
Conclusions:
- Current density functional approximations, even recent ones, require careful consideration for studies involving London-dispersion.
- The problem of London-dispersion is unlikely to be solved solely by empirical parameterization.
- Future development should focus on incorporating correct asymptotic long-range behavior into functionals.
- Chemists must be aware of these limitations when selecting computational methods.

