Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Correlation of Experimental Data01:23

Correlation of Experimental Data

520
Dimensional analysis simplifies complex physical problems and guides experimental investigations, but it does not provide complete solutions. It identifies the dimensionless groups that influence a phenomenon, but experimental data is needed to establish the specific relationships and validate theoretical predictions.
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
520
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test01:20

Spearman's Rank Correlation Test

1.6K
Spearman's rank correlation test, also known as Spearman's rho, is a nonparametric method for assessing the strength and direction of association between two variables. This test is particularly valuable when the data distribution is unknown or when the assumption of normality does not hold. Named after the English psychologist and statistician Dr. Charles Edward Spearman, it serves as the nonparametric counterpart to Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Spearman's test calculates correlation by...
1.6K
Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation01:15

Drug Concentration Versus Time Correlation

2.7K
The plasma drug concentration-time curve is a crucial tool in pharmacokinetics, representing the drug's concentration in plasma at different time intervals post-administration. This curve illustrates the drug's journey from absorption into the systemic circulation, distribution to body tissues, and eventual elimination through excretion or biotransformation.
Two pivotal parameters are the minimum effective concentration (MEC) and the minimum toxic concentration (MTC). The MEC is the...
2.7K
Coefficient of Correlation01:12

Coefficient of Correlation

9.1K
The correlation coefficient, r, developed by Karl Pearson in the early 1900s, is numerical and provides a measure of strength and direction of the linear association between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y.
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the...
9.1K
Correlation01:09

Correlation

15.8K
In statistics, two variables are said to be correlated if the values of one variable are associated with the other variable. Depending on the relationship between two variables, correlation can be of three types– positive correlation, negative correlation, and zero correlation.
Two variables, for example, a and b, are said to be positively correlated if both variables move in the same direction. In other words, a positive correlation exists between two variables, a and b, if:
15.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the mechanisms underlying saccade generation in the frontal eye fields using multi-site microstimulation.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Brain-wide arousal signals are segregated from movement planning in the superior colliculus of the macaque.

eLife·2026
Same author

Interactions across hemispheres in prefrontal cortex reflect global cognitive processing.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Linking reaction time variability to physiological markers of arousal across timescales.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

From Breath to Behavior: Respiratory Features Predict Visual Detection Performance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

The role of the locus coeruleus in eye movements during perceptual decision making.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

10.3K

Separating Spike Count Correlation from Firing Rate Correlation.

Giuseppe Vinci1, Valérie Ventura2, Matthew A Smith3

  • 1Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A. gvinci@andrew.cmu.edu.

Neural Computation
|March 5, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cortical neurons show correlated activity, but spike count correlation (SCC) is a noisy measure of firing rate correlation (FRC). New methods separate these, revealing noise often obscures true neural correlations.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multichannel Extracellular Recording for Studying Neuronal Activity in Freely Moving Mice
08:59

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multichannel Extracellular Recording for Studying Neuronal Activity in Freely Moving Mice

Published on: May 26, 2023

4.0K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

11.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 24, 2026

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions
07:34

A Simple Stimulatory Device for Evoking Point-like Tactile Stimuli: A Searchlight for LFP to Spike Transitions

Published on: March 25, 2014

10.3K
Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multichannel Extracellular Recording for Studying Neuronal Activity in Freely Moving Mice
08:59

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Multichannel Extracellular Recording for Studying Neuronal Activity in Freely Moving Mice

Published on: May 26, 2023

4.0K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

11.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Cortical neurons exhibit correlated trial-to-trial spiking activity.
  • Spike count correlation (SCC) is a common measure, but it is a noisy estimate of firing rate correlation (FRC).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate statistical methods for separating SCC from FRC.
  • To investigate the impact of trial-to-trial variability on neural correlation measures.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical modeling to distinguish time-averaged drive from within-trial noise.
  • Analysis of in vivo recordings from area V4 neurons in alert animals.

Main Results:

  • Within-trial noise effects are generally negligible.
  • Trial-to-trial variability significantly attenuates SCC compared to FRC.
  • Noise in SCC can lead to inaccurate comparisons of underlying FRC.

Conclusions:

  • The developed methods reliably separate SCC and FRC.
  • Noise significantly impacts the interpretation of SCC, often masking true FRC.
  • Accurate assessment of neural correlations requires accounting for trial-to-trial variability.