Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 24, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Relationship Between Procedural Volume and Outcomes
Apurva O Badheka1, Sidakpal S Panaich2, Shilpkumar Arora3
1Interventional Cardiology Department, The Everett Clinic, 3901 Hoyt Ave, Everett, WA, 98201, USA. abadheka@everettclinic.com.
PCI is a common treatment for heart conditions like acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease. While PCI centers have expanded, recent data shows a decline in the number of procedures performed at both operator and hospital levels. This raises concerns about whether these lower volumes affect the quality of care and patient outcomes. Guidelines suggest that operators should perform at least 50 procedures per year in hospitals doing over 200 PCIs annually. However, many hospitals are not meeting these thresholds. The study reviews the importance of procedural volume as a quality metric and suggests that declining volumes may impact procedural safety and outcomes. The authors propose that volume remains a key indicator of PCI quality and recommend continued monitoring of these trends.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular intervention outcomes research
- Medical procedure volume and quality metrics
- Acute coronary syndromes treatment
Background:
Prior research has shown that procedural volume influences outcomes in various medical fields. It was already known that higher volumes correlate with better results in surgeries and complex interventions. No prior work had resolved whether these findings apply specifically to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The expansion of PCI centers raised questions about maintaining skill levels. Declining PCI volumes at both operator and hospital levels introduced new uncertainties. This gap motivated an investigation into volume as a quality metric for PCI. That uncertainty drove the need to assess whether minimal procedural thresholds are sufficient. No prior work had examined how recent volume declines affect clinical outcomes.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to examine the relationship between PCI procedural volume and clinical outcomes. The specific problem is whether declining PCI volumes threaten procedural quality and safety. The motivation stems from concerns about maintaining operator and hospital competency. The researchers propose to evaluate whether current procedural thresholds are adequate. The study focuses on operator and hospital-level volume thresholds. The goal is to determine if these thresholds are being met nationwide. The researchers aim to assess the impact of volume on PCI outcomes. This work seeks to clarify whether volume remains a critical quality metric.
Main Methods:
The researchers conducted a literature review to analyze the relationship between PCI volume and outcomes. They examined data from the 2011 and 2013 ACC/AHA/SCAI competency statements. The study compared procedural volume thresholds across time. The researchers evaluated hospital and operator-level volume requirements. They analyzed recent data to assess how many centers meet these thresholds. The study focused on procedural outcomes following PCI. The researchers used published data to determine trends in PCI volume. The analysis included both national and institutional-level statistics.
Main Results:
Recent data indicates that many hospitals fail to meet PCI volume thresholds. The 2011 requirement was >75 PCIs per operator annually at high-volume centers. The 2013 update lowered the threshold to >50 PCIs per operator in hospitals with >200 PCIs annually. The study found that national PCI volume has declined significantly. Declining volumes raise concerns about operator skill maintenance. The researchers observed that many institutions do not meet recommended thresholds. The data suggests a potential decline in procedural quality. The findings highlight the importance of volume as a quality metric. The study emphasizes the need to monitor PCI volume trends.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that procedural volume remains a vital quality metric for PCI. They suggest that declining volumes may threaten procedural safety and outcomes. The study highlights the importance of maintaining operator and hospital-level thresholds. The researchers emphasize the need to monitor PCI volume trends closely. The findings suggest that many institutions fail to meet recommended thresholds. The authors propose that volume should remain a key indicator of PCI quality. The study supports the idea that volume is linked to better clinical outcomes. The researchers propose that further monitoring is necessary to ensure procedural quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
The authors propose that higher procedural volumes are associated with better outcomes in PCI. Recent data suggests many hospitals fail to meet recommended thresholds.
The 2011 requirement was >75 PCIs per operator annually at high-volume centers. The 2013 update lowered the threshold to >50 PCIs per operator in hospitals with >200 PCIs annually.
The authors propose that higher volumes are linked to better outcomes. Declining volumes may threaten operator skill and procedural safety.
Recent data indicates that many hospitals do not meet recommended PCI volume thresholds. This raises concerns about maintaining procedural quality.
The study suggests declining volumes may lead to worse clinical outcomes. The authors propose that volume remains a key indicator of procedural quality.
The authors propose that volume should remain a key quality metric. They suggest that declining volumes may threaten procedural safety and outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization

