Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 22, 2026

05:14
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
733
Can We Use the Fellow Eye Biometric Data to Predict IOL Power?
Maddalena De Bernardo1, Lucio Zeppa2, Raimondo Forte1
1a Department of Medicine and Surgery , University of Salerno , Salerno , Italy.
Seminars in Ophthalmology
|April 15, 2016
Summary
Bilateral eye measurements for keratometry (K) and axial length (AL) show slight but statistically significant differences. These variations can impact intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations, emphasizing the need for careful fellow eye validation.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biometry
- Refractive Surgery
Background:
- Accurate biometry is crucial for successful intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
- Understanding interocular symmetry in ocular measurements is essential for predictable refractive outcomes.
- Population-based data provides a robust foundation for clinical decision-making.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between right (RE) and left (LE) eye keratometry (K) and axial length (AL) in a population-based sample.
- To assess the prevalence of significant interocular differences in K and AL.
- To evaluate the implications of these differences for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of partial coherence interferometry data from 4516 eyes of 2258 patients.
- Inclusion of subjects with a wide age range (18-96 years).
- Statistical correlation and comparison of K and AL measurements between RE and LE.
Main Results:
- Average K showed a statistically significant difference between RE (44.01 ± 1.50 D) and LE (44.04 ± 1.53 D) (p = 0.0075).
- Average AL also showed a statistically significant difference between RE (23.89 ± 1.77 mm) and LE (23.84 ± 1.68 mm) (p = 0.0018).
- 4.5% of patients had K differences ≥ 1 D, and 19.2% had AL differences ≥ 0.4 mm, both potentially leading to ~1 D IOL power discrepancies.
Conclusions:
- Clinicians must be aware of potential interocular biometric differences when calculating IOL power.
- Validation of measurements using the fellow eye is recommended.
- Symmetric biometric findings are crucial for reliable outcomes in the second eye, especially for post-cataract refractive error management.

