Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

3.5K
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
3.5K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

7.2K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
7.2K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.3K
Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation01:09

Empirical Method to Interpret Standard Deviation

10.5K
The empirical rule, also known as the three-sigma rule, allows a statistician to interpret the standard deviation in a normally distributed dataset. The rule states that 68% of the data lies within one standard deviation from the mean, 95% lies within two standard deviations from the mean, and 99.7% lies within three standard deviations from the mean. Additionally, this rule is also called the 68-95-99.7 rule.
This rule is used widely in statistics to calculate the proportion of data values...
10.5K
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

448
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
448
Modeling and Similitude01:12

Modeling and Similitude

711
Scaled modeling is a fundamental technique in engineering, enabling the study of large and complex systems by creating smaller, manageable replicas that recreate critical characteristics of the original. In hydrology and civil infrastructure, for example, scaled models of dams help analyze water flow, turbulence, and pressure. This method allows for accurate predictions of real-world behavior within a controlled environment, significantly reducing the cost and time involved in full-scale...
711

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From 2015 to 2023, eight years of empirical research on research integrity: a scoping review.

Research integrity and peer review·2025
Same author

From regional climate models to usable information.

Climatic change·2024
Same author

Epistemological challenges for neural correlates of consciousness: A defense of medical research on consciousness.

Presse medicale (Paris, France : 1983)·2023
Same author

Machine learning and the quest for objectivity in climate model parameterization.

Climatic change·2023
Same author

Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2023
Same author

[Multidimensional and computational theory of mood].

L'Encephale·2022
Same journal

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

A frame-based approach for reconstructing theories.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Strategic ignorance, and the management of performative effects: Lessons from climate economics.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Fictionalism and scientific realism: A response to ungrounded criticism.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Is Emergy really a theory of value ?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same journal

Echoes of Georgescu-Roegen's thermodynamic view in Latin American development debates.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 22, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Empirical agreement in model validation.

Julie Jebeile1, Anouk Barberousse1

  • 1Université Paris-Sorbonne, SND, Paris, France.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|April 17, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific models require more than just empirical agreement for validation. This study examines how empirical agreement is used in model validation, highlighting its limitations when hypotheses lack plausibility.

Keywords:
CalibrationConfirmation holismEmpirical agreementModel validationScientific modeling

More Related Videos

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 22, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.8K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Scientific modeling
  • Model validation methodologies
  • Epistemology of science

Background:

  • Empirical agreement is a common metric for scientific model validity.
  • Models can be adjusted to fit data despite questionable underlying hypotheses.
  • The sufficiency of empirical agreement as a sole validation criterion is debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role and limitations of empirical agreement in scientific model validation.
  • To analyze how empirical agreement is utilized within the broader model validation process.
  • To explore scenarios where empirical agreement may be misleading.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of model validation criteria.
  • Literature review on scientific modeling and validation.
  • Case study analysis (hypothetical or real-world examples) illustrating the use of empirical agreement.

Main Results:

  • Empirical agreement alone does not guarantee a model's validity.
  • Over-reliance on empirical agreement can mask flawed model hypotheses.
  • The process of model validation necessitates considering factors beyond data fit.

Conclusions:

  • Model validation must incorporate assessments of hypothesis plausibility alongside empirical agreement.
  • A nuanced approach is required to effectively validate scientific models.
  • Future research should focus on developing robust methods for evaluating hypothesis plausibility in modeling.