Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Transient and Steady-state Response

Transient and Steady-state Response

In control systems, test signals are essential for evaluating performance under various conditions. The ramp function is effective for systems undergoing gradual changes, while the step function is suitable for assessing systems facing sudden disturbances. For systems subjected to shock inputs, the impulse function is the most appropriate test signal.
These test signals are integral in designing control systems to exhibit two key performance aspects: transient response and steady-state...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A reciprocal model of practice and skill: Navigating between dropout and expertise.

Psychological review·2026

Same author

Polarization in increasingly connected societies.

Physical review. E·2026

Same author

From night-to-night and from person-to-person: dynamic phenomena of insomnia.

Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society·2026

Same author

A theory-construction methodology for network theories in psychology.

Psychological methods·2026

Same author

The statistical physics of psychological networks: Zero matters.

Psychological review·2026

Same author

Balancing stability and flexibility: investigating a dynamic <i>K</i> value approach for the Elo rating system in adaptive learning environments.

User modeling and user-adapted interaction·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 21, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

Distinguishing Fast and Slow Processes in Accuracy - Response Time Data.

Frederik Coomans^1,2, Abe Hofman¹, Matthieu Brinkhuis¹

¹Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

|May 12, 2016

Summary

This study reveals that simple problem-solving speed and accuracy are linked, with a two-process model better explaining the relationship than one-process models for diverse cognitive tasks.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice

The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice

Published on: December 29, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 21, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice

The Rodent Psychomotor Vigilance Test rPVT: A Method for Assessing Neurobehavioral Performance in Rats and Mice

Published on: December 29, 2016

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Psychometrics
Decision Science

Background:

Understanding the relationship between response speed and accuracy is crucial in cognitive psychology.
Existing psychometric models offer different perspectives on this speed-accuracy trade-off.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between speed and accuracy in basic problem-solving tasks.
To compare the efficacy of one-process and two-process models in explaining this relationship across various domains.

Main Methods:

Utilized a simplified problem-solving setup with binary accuracy and speed variables.
Surveyed a large number of item pairs from diverse domains including arithmetic, language learning, intelligence, and chess.
Compared three psychometric models: two 'one-process' models and one 'two-process' model.

Main Results:

Data strongly violated the assumptions of both one-process models.
A 'two-process' model, where accuracy is contingent on response time, provided a parsimonious explanation.
Analysis of errors showed significant differences between fast and slow responses.

Conclusions:

The relationship between speed and accuracy in problem-solving is complex and cannot be adequately captured by simple one-process models.
A two-process model offers a more robust framework for understanding cognitive performance.
Error analysis highlights distinct patterns in fast versus slow response errors.