Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

MRI and PET in Mouse Models of Myocardial Infarction
Published on: December 19, 2013
The practical value of technetium-99m-MIBI SPET to differentiate between ischemic and non-ischemic heart failure
Osman Beton1, Ozge Kurmus, Lale Dinc Asarcikli
1Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Cumhuriyet University, PC 58140, Sivas, Turkey. obeton@cumhuriyet.edu.tr.
Objective:
We aimed to differentiate ischemic heart failure (HF) from non-ischemic HF in patients presenting with non-acute onset exertional dyspnea using technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile gated single photon emission tomography ((99m)Tc-MIBI gSPET) imaging.
Subjects And Methods:
One hundred and seventy nine consecutive patients with exertional dyspnea without concomitant chest pain referred to (99m)Tc-MIBI gSPET imaging were included in this study. All patients had a newly diagnosed HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Imaging findings were compared between ischemic HF and non-ischemic HF groups.
Results:
Of the 179 patients, 127 had ischemic HF and 52 had non-ischemic HF. There was no difference between ischemic and non-ischemic groups in terms of age, gender, body mass index, any smoking history, diabetes mellitus, history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Global dysfunction of left ventricle was more common in non-ischemic HF group than ischemic HF group (82.7% vs 41.7% respectively, P<0.001). Presence of severe (3+/4+) ischemia and large perfusion defect were higher in ischemic HF group compared to non-ischemic HF group (45.7% vs 15.4%, P<0.001 and 23.6% vs 3.8%, P=0.003, respectively). Summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score and summed difference score were higher in ischemic HF group compared to non-ischemic HF group (P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.021, respectively). In multivariate analysis, absence of global dysfunction (P<0.001, OR=10.338, 95%CI: 3.937-27.405) and SSS (P<0.001, OR=1.208, 95%CI: 1.090-1.339) were the independent predictors of ischemic HF. Absence of global dysfunction had 58.3% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity for diagnosis of ischemic HF at gSPET imaging in patients presenting with newly diagnosed HF and exertional dyspnea without concomitant chest pain (AUC=0.705, 95%CI: 0.632-0.771, P<0.001), whereas SSS>8 had 65.4% sensitivity and 75.0% specificity (AUC=0.732, 95%CI: 0.661-0.795, P<0.001).
Conclusion:
Absence of global dysfunction and SSS on SPET imaging were the independent predictors of ischemic etiology of HF presenting with dyspnea without concomitant chest pain. These findings had a low sensitivity, but acceptable specificity.
More Related Videos
08:13In Vivo Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Structure, Function, Perfusion and Viability Using Cardiac Micro-computed Tomography
Published on: February 16, 2016
06:29Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Magnetic Resonance Imaging