Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 27, 2026

Application of Optical Coherence Tomography to a Mouse Model of Retinopathy
Published on: January 12, 2022
Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among
Anant Agrawal1, Jigesh Baxi1, William Calhoun1
1Division of Biomedical Physics Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices show significant differences in measuring optic nerve head (ONH) dimensions for glaucoma monitoring. Using standardized analysis methods with OCT phantoms can improve measurement consistency across devices.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is crucial for glaucoma monitoring by assessing optic nerve head (ONH) dimensions.
- Existing clinical studies highlight variability in retinal dimension measurements between different OCT devices.
- Standardized comparison methods are needed to evaluate OCT device performance for ONH analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and utilize ONH morphology mimicking phantoms for inter-device comparison of clinical OCT systems.
- To assess the accuracy and consistency of ONH measurements (cup-to-disc ratio and cup volume) across multiple OCT devices.
Main Methods:
- Fabrication of three ONH phantoms: one normal and two simulating glaucomatous anatomies.
- Scanning of phantoms using Stratus, RTVue, and Cirrus clinical OCT devices, plus a laboratory OCT system as reference.
- Analysis of device-reported ONH measurements and comparison with offline manual and custom software algorithm measurements.
Main Results:
- Significant inter-device differences were observed in 16 out of 18 comparisons of device-reported ONH measurements.
- Mean absolute differences for cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) were 0.082 (device-reported) vs. 0.013 (offline).
- Mean absolute differences for cup volume were 0.044 mm³ (device-reported) vs. 0.019 mm³ (offline), with Cirrus offline measurements differing significantly from Stratus and RTVue.
Conclusions:
- Proprietary ONH analysis algorithms are the primary cause of inter-device measurement variability in OCT devices.
- Applying a consistent offline analysis technique significantly improves measurement similarity across different OCT devices.
- Phantom-based studies offer valuable insights into OCT measurement characteristics for ONH assessment in glaucoma.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Properties of Enantiomers and Optical Activity
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...

