Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

09:16
Simultaneous ex vivo Functional Testing of Two Retinas by in vivo Electroretinogram System
Published on: May 6, 2015
9.9K
Evaluation of cone function by a handheld non-mydriatic flicker electroretinogram device
Natsuko Nakamura1, Kaoru Fujinami1, Yoshinobu Mizuno2
1Laboratory of Visual Physiology, Division of Vision Research, National Institute of Sensory Organs.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|July 23, 2016
Summary
A new handheld electroretinogram (ERG) device, RETeval™, offers a quick, noninvasive method for screening cone dysfunction. This portable ERG effectively identifies patients needing further testing for retinal diseases.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Retinal diagnostics
- Medical devices
Background:
- Full-field electroretinograms (ERGs) assess retinal function but require invasive procedures like pupillary dilation and contact lens electrodes.
- A simpler, noninvasive screening method for retinal diseases is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the handheld, portable RETeval™ device for screening cone dysfunction.
- To determine if RETeval™ can provide a noninvasive alternative to conventional ERG testing.
Main Methods:
- Flicker ERGs were recorded using RETeval™ with skin electrodes on 35 patients with known cone dysfunction and compared to 50 healthy eyes.
- Patients had various hereditary and acquired retinal diseases, including achromatopsia and retinitis pigmentosa.
- The study analyzed flicker ERG amplitudes and implicit times across three age groups.
Main Results:
- Patients with cone dysfunction showed significantly smaller flicker ERG amplitudes and longer implicit times compared to control eyes.
- Nearly all patients with cone dysfunction had flicker amplitudes below the mean -2.0 standard deviation of controls.
- The RETeval™ examination was completed in under 5 minutes without pupil dilation or contact lens electrodes.
Conclusions:
- The RETeval™ device shows potential as a noninvasive screening tool for cone dysfunction.
- It can efficiently identify patients requiring more comprehensive ERG testing.
- While not assessing scotopic function, it simplifies initial screening for photopic cone responses.

