Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 15, 2026
Development and Implementation of a Multi-Disciplinary Technology Enhanced Care Pathway for Youth and Adults with Concussion
Published on: January 20, 2019
More Than Reducing Complexity: Canadian Specialists' Views of the Royal College's Maintenance of Certification
Tanya Horsley1, Katherine Moreau, Jocelyn Lockyer
1Dr. Horsley: Associate Director, Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Moreau: Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Lockyer: Professor, Department of Community Health Sciences, Senior Associate Dean Education, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Ms. Zeiter: Research Coordinator, Research Unit, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Varpio: Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, Associate Director, Graduate Programs in Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Dr. Campbell: Director, Office of Continuing Professional Development, Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Introduction:
Maintenance of Certification (MOC) programs are facing competing pressures from physicians and regulators to design and deliver systems that ensure physicians sustain or maintain competence postcertification. Adding to these pressures is an emerging discourse of dissatisfaction by physicians participating in MOC programs suggesting physicians themselves are seeking programs that are relevant to their scope of practice. The object was to determine Canadian specialists' views of a redesigned Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada's MOC program in five priority areas: complexity, motivation, impact, credit sufficiency, and enhancement.
Methods:
A national, cross-specialty, survey of Royal College of Physician and Surgeons of Canada's MOC program users who had participated for at least 1 year.
Results:
Five thousand two hundred fifty nine respondents were included in the analysis. A majority of participates either "agreed" (2258, 43%) or "strongly agreed" (631, 12%) that the new framework was simpler to understand and the redesigned submission templates were simpler to use ("agree" 2297 [43.7%], "strongly agree" 701 [13.3%]). A total of 64.5% had a good understanding of the program purposes; however, some respondents believe the program does not yet deliver intended outcomes. Maintaining Fellowship designation, regulatory requirements, and a desire to remain up-to-date were indicated as the primary motivators for engaging in MOC. The program has had a modest influence on users' approach to lifelong learning ("neither agree nor disagree").
Discussion:
The program redesign reduced the perceived complexity of the MOC framework however it is described by some, as additional work (an add-on) by necessitating the documentation of participation in learning activities. An important "disconnect" between the program purposes and how physicians operationalize engagement was also illuminated by our study. Further attention needs to be paid to shifting the culture of continuing professional development to one that enables physicians to sufficiently demonstrate their continuing competence and enhanced performance meaningfully through participation in MOC programs.
More Related Videos
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
10:38Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
01:19Standards of Care II
01:22Standards of Care I
01:30National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
01:23Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
01:15Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
01:30Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...