Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

518
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
518

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

NLRP3 inflammasome activation by particles and fibers: implications for human hazard assessment.

Archives of toxicology·2026
Same author

Food Origin Authenticity Using Deep Learning and Citizen Science: Bananas Case Study.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

The role of artificial intelligence in combating food fraud: a systematic literature review.

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition·2026
Same author

Application of HepaRG mono- and HepaRG:THP-1 cocultures as immune responsive hepatotoxicity models.

Toxicology·2026
Same author

Application of small molecule inhibitors to probe the mechanism underlying nanomaterial pulmonary inflammatory responses <i>in vitro</i>.

Nanotoxicology·2026
Same author

Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety: A Tertiary Study.

Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety·2026
Same journal

Self-Powered Fine Dust Filtration Using Triboelectrification-Induced Electric Field.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Bio-distribution of Carbon Nanoparticles Studied by Photoacoustic Measurements.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Effects of High-Temperature Growth of Dislocation Filter Layers in GaAs-on-Si.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Correction: Assembly of Carbon Dots into Frameworks with Enhanced Stability and Antibacterial Activity.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Improved Subthreshold Characteristics by Back-Gate Coupling on Ferroelectric ETSOI FETs.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Gold Nanoparticles Enhancing Generation of ROS for Cs-137 Radiotherapy.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
17:16

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

10.9K

A Tractable Method for Measuring Nanomaterial Risk Using Bayesian Networks.

Finbarr Murphy1, Barry Sheehan2, Martin Mullins2

  • 1Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. Finbarr.Murphy@ul.ie.

Nanoscale Research Letters
|November 17, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Bayesian networks offer a scalable solution for nanomaterial (NM) risk estimation, overcoming data inconsistencies. This approach provides accurate occupational risk probabilities for NMs, making risk assessment more accessible.

Keywords:
BayesianControl bandingRisk assessment

More Related Videos

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances
08:18

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances

Published on: October 10, 2020

6.2K
Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
09:53

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 12, 2026

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring
17:16

Registered Bioimaging of Nanomaterials for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Monitoring

Published on: December 9, 2010

10.9K
A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances
08:18

A Small-Scale Setup for Algal Toxicity Testing of Nanomaterials and Other Difficult Substances

Published on: October 10, 2020

6.2K
Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
09:53

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Nanomaterial Safety
  • Risk Assessment
  • Computational Toxicology

Background:

  • Control banding is a recognized framework for evaluating human health risks from nanomaterials (NMs).
  • Current control banding approaches lack widespread implementation due to inconsistencies in characterization data, toxicology, and exposure scenarios.
  • Difficulty exists in comparing NM risks based on physicochemical data, concentration, and exposure routes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the utility of Bayesian networks for reliable nanomaterial risk estimation.
  • To present a tractable, accessible, and scalable tool for quantitative risk assessment.
  • To address challenges posed by incomplete or variable data in NM risk evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Bayesian networks for nanomaterial risk estimation.
  • Incorporated diverse data types, including high-quality, incomplete, and probabilistic datasets.
  • Applied the method to assess risks associated with carbon nanotubes, silver, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles.
  • Demonstrated iterative learning capabilities to refine risk forecasts with improved data quality.

Main Results:

  • Bayesian networks provide a reliable and scalable tool for NM risk estimation.
  • The approach effectively handles data variability and missing values.
  • Accurate occupational risk probabilities were generated for various NMs, including carbon nanotubes, silver, and titanium dioxide.
  • The method enables non-experts to understand NM occupational risk probabilities.

Conclusions:

  • Bayesian networks offer a robust solution for quantitative nanomaterial risk assessment.
  • This approach enhances the tractability and accessibility of risk evaluation for NMs.
  • The developed tool facilitates a clearer understanding of occupational risks associated with nanomaterials.