Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 8, 2026

Evaluation of Synapse Density in Hippocampal Rodent Brain Slices
Published on: October 6, 2017
Neurite density index is sensitive to age related differences in the developing brain.
Sila Genc1, Charles B Malpas2, Scott K Holland3
1Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Neurite density index (NDI) from neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) better tracks white matter development in children and adolescents than traditional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- White matter development in youth involves increasing organization and coherence.
- Conventional diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics like fractional anisotropy (FA) are insensitive to specific developmental mechanisms.
- Distinguishing microstructural changes during development requires more sensitive imaging techniques.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between age and neurite density index (NDI) using neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI).
- To compare the age-classification accuracy of NDI with FA in a developmental cohort.
- To assess the utility of NODDI metrics in developmental neuroscience research.
Main Methods:
- Collected diffusion-weighted imaging data from 72 children and adolescents (ages 4-19).
- Compared NODDI metrics (NDI) against conventional DTI metrics (FA, MD, AD, RD) for their relationship with age.
- Utilized Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate classification accuracy for older versus younger participants.
Main Results:
- NDI showed a stronger relationship with age (median R²=.60) compared to DTI metrics (FA: R²=.27, MD: R²=.39, AD: R²=.14, RD: R²=.35).
- NDI achieved superior age-classification accuracy (median AUC=.89) between older and younger groups.
- MD, FA, and RD showed moderate classification abilities (AUCs ≈ .80), while AD was less effective (AUC=.64).
Conclusions:
- NDI is highly sensitive to age-related microstructural changes in white matter during development.
- NDI demonstrates greater sensitivity to developmental changes than commonly used DTI metrics.
- NODDI metrics are recommended for implementation in future developmental studies due to their enhanced sensitivity.
More Related Videos
07:14A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
Published on: January 16, 2026
09:01A Method for Investigating Age-related Differences in the Functional Connectivity of Cognitive Control Networks Associated with Dimensional Change Card Sort Performance
Published on: May 7, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Neural Regulation
Neuroplasticity
Neurogenesis and Regeneration of Nervous Tissue