Related Experiment Videos
Written expression of students with and without learning disabilities: differences across the grades
Journal of Learning Disabilities
|November 1, 1989
Summary
Students with learning disabilities (LD) exhibit persistent writing challenges compared to normally achieving (NA) peers. These difficulties span productivity, syntax, vocabulary, and mechanics, indicating a need for improved instructional strategies.
Area of Science:
- Educational Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Linguistics
Background:
- Learning disabilities (LD) significantly impact academic performance.
- Written expression is a critical area of academic achievement.
- Understanding specific deficits in students with LD is crucial for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the written expression skills of students with learning disabilities (LD) and normally achieving (NA) students.
- To identify specific areas of written expression where students with LD differ from their NA peers.
- To examine these differences across elementary, middle, and high school grades.
Main Methods:
- Writing samples were collected from 48 students with LD and 48 NA students across Grades 4, 8, and 11.
- Samples were analyzed for productivity (word count, sentence count), syntactic maturity (words per sentence, T-units, morphemes per T-unit), vocabulary (word length), and mechanics (capitalization, spelling, fragments).
- A standard stimulus was used to elicit writing samples for all participants.
Main Results:
- Students with LD produced fewer words and sentences than NA students.
- Students with LD wrote more words per sentence, but produced fewer longer words (7+ letters) and sentence fragments.
- Higher percentages of capitalization and spelling errors were observed in students with LD; no differences were found in T-units or morphemes per T-unit.
Conclusions:
- Students with learning disabilities demonstrate persistent deficits in written expression across multiple grade levels.
- Specific challenges include lower productivity and greater mechanical errors, despite comparable syntactic complexity in some measures.
- Findings underscore the necessity of reviewing and enhancing current educational practices to better support students with LD in writing development.