Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

7.2K
While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
7.2K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.6K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.6K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.8K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.8K
Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting01:14

Impression Management Techniques IV: Altercasting

205
Altercasting is a strategic communication technique in which an individual imposes a specific identity or social role onto another person to influence their behavior and shape the interaction. By presuming a role—such as “responsible leader” or “patient person”—altercasting encourages the target to conform to that identity, often aligning their behavior with the expectations associated with the role. The power of this tactic lies in its subtlety; once a role...
205
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

176
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
176

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patients with worry: presentation of concerns and expectations for response.

Patient education and counseling·2005
Same author

Responding effectively to patient anger directed at the physician.

Family medicine·2002
Same journal

Professional identity formation among participants in a longitudinal pediatric program for final year medical students: a qualitative case study.

Medical education online·2026
Same journal

Exploring medical Artificial Intelligence Readiness among Korean medical students: a cross-sectional study.

Medical education online·2026
Same journal

Consensus and learning climate in temporary versus permanent teams in team-based learning.

Medical education online·2026
Same journal

Associations among positive childhood experiences, resilience, and psychological distress in health professions students.

Medical education online·2026
Same journal

Pre-qualifications, learning strategies, and study satisfaction among medical students: insights from a multicenter German study.

Medical education online·2026
Same journal

Beyond initial adoption: addressing the know-do gap in technology-enhanced medical education.

Medical education online·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Determining Component Weights in a Communications Assessment Using Judgmental Policy Capturing.

Leo M Harvill1, F Forrest Lang1, Ronald S McCord

  • 1a Departments of Medical Education and Family Medicine James H. Quillen College of Medicine East Tennessee State University.

Medical Education Online
|March 3, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Judgmental policy capturing (JPC) effectively weights medical education assessments. Experts prioritized active listening and patient rapport, showing diverse component importance in performance evaluations.

Keywords:
component weightingjudgmental policy capturingobjective structured clinical examinationphysician-patient communication

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.0K
Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness
07:37

Assessment and Communication for People with Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: August 1, 2017

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Psychometrics
  • Healthcare Communication Assessment

Background:

  • Accurate weighting of performance assessment components is crucial in medical education.
  • Judgmental policy capturing (JPC) offers a statistical method to understand expert decision-making strategies.
  • The feasibility of JPC for defining weights in complex assessments needed investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the feasibility of using judgmental policy capturing (JPC) for determining appropriate weights for performance assessment components in medical education.
  • To establish statistically derived weights for communication skills assessed in medical students.

Main Methods:

  • Iterative judgmental policy capturing (JPC) was employed.
  • A panel of four communication skill experts evaluated six core communication skill scores.
  • Scores were derived from a communications objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for medical students.

Main Results:

  • Experts assigned varying importance to different communication skills.
  • Information management received the lowest weight (8.5%).
  • Rapport building (15.8%), agenda setting (15.4%), and addressing feelings (14.1%) received moderate, similar weights.
  • Active listening (20.1%) and reaching common ground (25.5%) were weighted highest.

Conclusions:

  • Judgmental policy capturing (JPC) is an effective method for determining weights in complex clinical assessment components.
  • The derived weights can differ significantly from initial assumptions or traditional scoring methods.
  • This approach provides a data-driven basis for refining assessment tools in medical education.