Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Perioperative factors limiting the discharge of patients treated with microvascular reconstruction after oral cancer resection.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology·2026
Same author

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Masculinizing Gender-Affirming Chest Surgery: Validation of the GENDER-Q Chest Scales.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same author

Reliability of a Vertical Reconstruction of the Abdomen Following Massive Weight Loss.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open·2026
Same author

Dry Liposuction for Upper-Extremity End-Stage Lymphedema: A Step-by-Step Video of Technique.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Feasibility of robot-assisted LVA under local anesthesia for arm lymphedema.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Repairing Peri-Anal Fistulas with regenerative cell therapeutics: study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled phase I-II trial from Denmark (REP-PAF).

Trials·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.6K

[Reconstructive breast surgery using implant and mesh].

Lene Nyhøj Heidemann1, Gudjon Leifur Gunnarsson, Camilla Bille

  • 1lenenyhoj@gmail.com.

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|March 7, 2017
PubMed
Summary

The hammock technique for breast reconstruction offers improved aesthetic results and reduces complications like capsular contracture. Proper patient selection is key to optimizing outcomes in this increasingly common reconstructive surgery.

More Related Videos

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.3K
Transvaginal Mesh Insertion in the Ovine Model
10:32

Transvaginal Mesh Insertion in the Ovine Model

Published on: July 27, 2017

17.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

4.6K
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
03:07

Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial

Published on: August 19, 2025

1.3K
Transvaginal Mesh Insertion in the Ovine Model
10:32

Transvaginal Mesh Insertion in the Ovine Model

Published on: July 27, 2017

17.1K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery
  • Biomaterials in Medicine

Background:

  • Increasing demand for breast reconstruction post-mastectomy.
  • Introduction of the hammock technique in 2001 for breast implant support.
  • Utilizes biologically derived or synthetic mesh for structural integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of the hammock technique in breast reconstruction.
  • To assess its impact on reconstruction time, capsular contracture, and aesthetic outcomes.
  • To determine the importance of patient selection for optimizing results.

Main Methods:

  • The hammock technique involves creating a supportive mesh structure in the lower pole of the breast implant pocket.
  • Biologically derived or synthetic mesh materials are employed.
  • Clinical outcomes including reconstruction duration, complication rates, and aesthetic assessments were evaluated.

Main Results:

  • The hammock technique has demonstrated a shortened reconstruction time.
  • It is associated with a decreased risk of capsular contracture.
  • Superior aesthetic results have been reported compared to traditional methods.

Conclusions:

  • The hammock technique is an effective method for breast reconstruction.
  • It offers significant advantages in terms of efficiency and aesthetic outcomes.
  • Careful patient selection is critical for maximizing benefits and minimizing complications.