Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

09:00
Spatial Measurements of Perfusion, Interstitial Fluid Pressure and Liposomes Accumulation in Solid Tumors
Published on: August 18, 2016
8.1K
Mediating Passive Tumor Accumulation through Particle Size, Tumor Type, and Location
Jillian L Perry, Kevin G Reuter, J Christopher Luft
1Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, United States.
Nano Letters
|March 14, 2017
Summary
The enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect in nanomedicine is highly variable. Nanoparticle size, tumor type, and location significantly influence tumor accumulation and penetration, impacting drug delivery strategies.
Area of Science:
- Nanomedicine
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cancer Research
Background:
- The enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect is crucial for passive tumor targeting in nanomedicine.
- However, the clinical translation of EPR-based strategies is hindered by its controversial and variable nature.
- Factors influencing EPR, including nanoparticle characteristics and tumor microenvironment, require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of nanoparticle size, tumor model, and location on the EPR effect.
- To evaluate the correlation between tumor microvessel density, vascular permeability, and particle accumulation.
- To assess nanoparticle penetration and accumulation in both subcutaneous and orthotopic tumor models.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of PRINT nanoparticle accumulation (55×60 nm, 80×180 nm, 80×320 nm) in four subcutaneous tumor models (SKOV3, 344SQ, A549, A431).
- Assessment of tumor microenvironment factors including microvessel density, vascular permeability, lymphatics, stromal content, and immune cells via immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence.
- Comparison of nanoparticle accumulation in subcutaneous versus orthotopic/metastatic tumor models.
Main Results:
- Significant particle size dependence and model-specific accumulation trends were observed.
- Tumor microvessel density correlated with overall nanoparticle accumulation.
- Smaller nanoparticles showed deeper tissue penetration, while larger ones localized near vasculature.
- Stromal content influenced penetration of smaller nanoparticles.
- Preferential accumulation in primary and metastatic tumors was noted for smaller particles.
- Orthotopic lung tumors showed higher accumulation than flank models; ovarian tumors showed consistent accumulation across locations.
Conclusions:
- The EPR effect is highly variable and significantly influenced by nanoparticle size, tumor type, and anatomical location.
- Tumor microenvironment characteristics play a critical role in mediating nanoparticle accumulation and penetration.
- These findings highlight the need for tailored nanomedicine design and preclinical models to optimize tumor targeting efficacy.
Related Concept Videos
The Tumor Microenvironment
8.0K
Every normal cell or tissue is embedded in a complex local environment called stroma, consisting of different cell types, a basal membrane, and blood vessels. As normal cells mutate and develop into cancer cells, their local environment also changes to allow cancer progression. The tumor microenvironment (TME) consists of a complex cellular matrix of stromal cells and the developing tumor. The cross-talk between cancer cells and surrounding stromal cells is critical to disrupt normal tissue...
8.0K
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Site-Targeted
58
Site-targeted drug delivery systems enhance therapeutic efficacy while minimizing systemic toxicity and treatment costs. Unlike conventional methods, these systems ensure precise drug delivery, improving bioavailability and reducing side effects. Targeted drug delivery is classified into three levels. First-order targeting directs drugs to the capillary beds of specific organs or tissues. Second-order targets specific cell types, such as tumor cells, using receptor-mediated interactions.
58

