Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 3, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Study of the wearable cardioverter defibrillator in advanced heart-failure patients (SWIFT)
Alon Barsheshet1,2, Valentina Kutyifa2, Theodora Vamvouris1
1Cardiology Department, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Insights
The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) safely bridges the decision for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in advanced heart failure (HF) patients. This study found no deaths during WCD use, demonstrating its safety in high-risk HF populations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCD) offer a potential bridge to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) assessment for high-risk heart failure (HF) patients.
- Limited data exists on WCD efficacy in acute decompensated HF.
- This study addresses the WCD's role in advanced HF management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the WCD in patients hospitalized with advanced heart failure.
- To assess arrhythmic events, WCD use, and mortality in this patient population.
- To determine if WCD management is a viable strategy for guiding ICD implantation decisions.
Main Methods:
- Prospective clinical trial (SWIFT) at two medical centers.
- Enrolled 75 advanced HF patients with reduced LVEF, prescribed WCD for 3 months.
- Monitored arrhythmic events, WCD discharge, and death.
Main Results:
- Mean LVEF was 21.5 ± 10.4%; 66% had non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
- Median WCD wear time was 59 days; 80% wore it >50% of daily hours.
- 8 arrhythmic events in 5 patients; 1 polymorphic VT successfully terminated by WCD. No deaths or inappropriate therapies occurred during WCD use.
Conclusions:
- A management strategy using WCD is safe for high-risk advanced HF patients.
- WCD use effectively bridges the decision-making process for ICD implantation.
- The WCD can be safely incorporated into the care of advanced HF patients awaiting further assessment.
Introduction:
The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) may allow stabilization until reassessment for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) among high-risk heart failure (HF) patients. However, there are limited data on the WCD benefit in the acute decompensated HF setting.
Methods And Results:
The Study of the Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Advanced Heart Failure Patients (SWIFT) was a prospective clinical trial carried out at two medical centers. Patients hospitalized with advanced HF symptoms and reduced left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) were enrolled and prescribed a WCD prior to discharge for a total of 3 months. Outcome measures included arrhythmic events, WCD discharge, and death. Study patients (n = 75, mean age 51 ± 14 years, 31% women) had a mean LVEF of 21.5 ± 10.4%. Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 66% of patients. The median WCD wearing time was 59 (interquartile range 17-97) days, and 80% of patients wore the device >50% of daily hours. WCD interrogations showed a total of 8 arrhythmic events in 5 patients, including 3 nonsustained or self-terminating ventricular tachycardia (VT) events, and one polymorphic VT successfully terminated by the WCD. None of the patients died while wearing the device and no inappropriate device therapies occurred. Upon termination of treatment with the WCD, 21 patients (28%) received an ICD. At 3 years, the cumulative death rate was 20% in the ischemic and 21% in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients.
Conclusion:
A management strategy incorporating the WCD can be safely used to bridge the decision regarding the need for ICD implantation in high-risk patients with advanced HF.
More Related Videos
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents