Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.6K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.6K
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments01:30

Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments

580
Electronic Distance Measuring Instruments (EDMs) are essential tools in modern surveying, offering precise distance measurements by emitting electromagnetic signals and calculating the time required for these signals to travel to a target and return. Two primary types of signals are used in EDMs — light waves and microwaves — each suited to specific environmental and distance requirements. Light-wave-based EDMs utilize either infrared or laser light, providing high accuracy over...
580
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors01:15

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors

1.9K
The role of the detectors in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is to analyze the solutes as they exit from the chromatographic column. The detector recognizes the solute's property and generates corresponding electrical signals, which are converted into a readable graph of the detector's response versus elution time called a chromatogram at the computer. There are several types of HPLC detectors, each with its own advantages and limitations, depending on the analyte...
1.9K
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors01:13

Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors

2.2K
Detectors in gas chromatography (GC) help identify and quantify the components of a mixture by translating chemical properties into measurable signals, which are displayed on a chromatogram. Detectors can be categorized into two main types: destructive and non-destructive.
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
2.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantum hypergraph states: a review.

Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)·2026
Same author

Maximally Nonprojective Measurements Are Not Always Symmetric Informationally Complete.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

The Standard Model Symmetry and Qubit Entanglement.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Editorial: Celebrating the First Century of Quantum Physics and Preparing for the Next One.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Distributed Quantum Incompatibility.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Learning Logical Pauli Noise in Quantum Error Correction.

Physical review letters·2023
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.1K

Device-Independent Bounds on Detection Efficiency.

Jochen Szangolies1, Hermann Kampermann1, Dagmar Bruß1

  • 1Institut für Theoretische Physik III, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, D-40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.

Physical Review Letters
|July 15, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to derive Bell inequalities that guarantee a minimum detector efficiency, crucial for secure quantum information applications. This technique ensures reliable quantum security even against adversaries controlling the experiment.

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications
03:31

Author Spotlight: Enhancement of Salient Object Detection for Smart Grid Applications

Published on: December 15, 2023

1.1K
Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band
06:43

Effective Analysis of Human Exposure Conditions with Body-worn Dosimeters in the 2.4 GHz Band

Published on: May 2, 2018

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Quantum Cryptography
  • Quantum Metrology

Background:

  • Quantum information applications require high detector efficiency to avoid loopholes.
  • The detection loophole in Bell inequality tests can lead to false positives, compromising quantum security.
  • Adversarial control over quantum sources and detectors exacerbates the challenge of ensuring efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for establishing lower bounds on detector efficiency in quantum experiments.
  • To derive Bell inequalities that are inherently free from the detection loophole.
  • To certify minimal detector efficiency using only measurement statistics, even under adversarial conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic derivation of Bell inequalities tailored to bypass the detection loophole.
  • Analysis of measurement statistics to establish efficiency bounds.
  • Theoretical framework to certify detector performance against potential adversaries.

Main Results:

  • A novel technique for generating loophole-free Bell inequalities.
  • Demonstration that these inequalities provide verifiable lower bounds on detector efficiency.
  • The method is robust even when an adversary controls the source and detectors.

Conclusions:

  • The presented Bell inequalities offer a robust way to certify detector efficiency in quantum information tasks.
  • This work enhances the security and reliability of quantum cryptographic protocols.
  • The findings are critical for advancing practical quantum technologies that rely on high-fidelity detection.