Accessory Structures of the Skin: Nails
Cardiovascular System Abnormal Findings I: Inspection and Palpation
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System II: Inspection
Assessment of the Mouth
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Feb 26, 2026

Non-Invasive Visualization of Nailbed Microvascular Morphology in Mice Using Capillaroscopy
Published on: February 28, 2025
Caroline De Lorenzi1, Marem Abosaleh1, Wolf-Henning Boehncke1
1Service de dermatologie et vénéréologie, HUG, 1211 Genève 14.
This article discusses how general practitioners can identify and manage nail changes in everyday clinical practice. Nail changes are common and may signal underlying conditions such as trauma, infection, or inflammation. The most frequent symptom is nail dystrophy, which can present differently depending on the cause. The study aims to help general practitioners recognize when a specialist referral is needed. It emphasizes the importance of clinical history and presentation in diagnosis. The authors do not propose new treatments but suggest a diagnostic framework to improve accuracy. The findings highlight the need for careful evaluation of nail changes to avoid missing serious conditions.
Area of Science:
Background:
General practitioners frequently encounter patients with nail changes in clinical settings. These presentations often signal underlying pathologies, such as trauma, infection, or inflammation. While some nail changes are benign, others may indicate more serious conditions. Prior research has shown that nail dystrophy is a common symptom across various nail disorders. However, the specific cause of nail changes remains unclear in many cases. This uncertainty drives the need for a structured diagnostic approach in primary care. No prior work has resolved the diagnostic overlap between nail dystrophy and other systemic conditions. That uncertainty motivates the need for clearer guidelines for general practitioners.
Purpose Of The Study:
This article aims to guide general practitioners in identifying and managing nail changes in clinical practice. The specific problem addressed is the lack of clarity in diagnosing nail disorders. The motivation is to improve diagnostic accuracy and referral decisions. The authors propose a framework for evaluating nail changes based on common presentations. This approach may help reduce diagnostic delays in primary care settings. The study does not aim to introduce new treatments but to clarify diagnostic considerations. The focus is on distinguishing between benign and potentially serious nail changes. The goal is to enhance the ability of general practitioners to recognize when specialist referral is necessary.
Main Methods:
The authors review clinical presentations of nail changes in primary care settings. They analyze the most common symptoms, such as nail dystrophy, and their potential causes. The study uses a literature-based approach to synthesize existing knowledge. It categorizes nail changes based on underlying pathologies. The authors compare diagnostic indicators for trauma, infection, and inflammation. They highlight the importance of clinical history in nail disorder diagnosis. The review includes examples of nail changes associated with neoplasia. The approach emphasizes the role of general practitioners in initial assessment and referral.
Main Results:
The most frequent nail changes are linked to trauma, infection, or inflammation. Neoplastic causes are less common but must be considered in differential diagnosis. Nail dystrophy is a key symptom across multiple nail disorders. The presentation of dystrophy varies depending on the underlying pathology. Traumatic nail changes often show distinct patterns of damage. Infections may present with discoloration or nail separation. Inflammatory conditions are associated with nail thickening or ridging. The study does not report specific diagnostic accuracy rates but emphasizes clinical indicators.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that nail changes should be evaluated with a focus on clinical history and presentation. They suggest that general practitioners should consider trauma, infection, and inflammation as primary differentials. Neoplasia remains a less frequent but important diagnostic possibility. The study does not claim that nail dystrophy is always indicative of a serious condition. The authors recommend referral to a specialist when diagnostic uncertainty persists. They emphasize the importance of distinguishing between benign and pathological nail changes. The findings suggest that a structured diagnostic approach may improve patient outcomes. The authors do not propose new treatment guidelines but highlight the need for accurate diagnosis.
The most common symptom is nail dystrophy, which refers to an alteration or disruption in nail growth.
Trauma, infection, and inflammation are the most common causes of nail changes.
Clinical history helps distinguish between benign and pathological nail changes, guiding appropriate referral decisions.
Neoplasia is a less frequent cause of nail changes but must be considered in differential diagnosis.
Traumatic changes often show distinct patterns of damage, while inflammatory changes may involve thickening or ridging.
The authors recommend a structured diagnostic approach and specialist referral when diagnostic uncertainty exists.