Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Eye-Tracking Causality.

Tobias Gerstenberg1, Matthew F Peterson1, Noah D Goodman2

  • 11 Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Psychological Science
|October 18, 2017
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence from formal logical reasoning reveals that the language of thought is not natural language.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Causal information changes how we reason: a mixed-methods analysis of decision-making with causal information.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

Seeing, hearing, and feeling causation.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Conniving With Continuations: Representing Goals in a Domain-Specific Language of Thought.

Topics in cognitive science·2026
Same author

Neural representation of action symbols in primate frontal cortex.

Nature·2026
Same author

Human-level learning of complex novel tasks as theory-based modelling, exploration and planning.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Boosting Media Literacy Using Lateral Reading and Online Search Interventions.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

People use counterfactual simulation to make causal judgments. By mentally replaying events, they assess how outcomes would change without a potential cause, strengthening their causal reasoning.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Causal Inference
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Causal judgment theories diverge: counterfactual theories emphasize "what if" scenarios, while process theories focus on observed mechanisms.
  • The role of spontaneous counterfactual simulation in causal judgment remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of counterfactual simulation in human causal judgments.
  • To differentiate between counterfactual and process theories of causal inference.

Main Methods:

  • Eye-tracking was used to monitor participants' visual attention during causal judgment tasks.
  • Participants judged causal relationships between moving billiard balls, specifically focusing on cause-effect events.

Main Results:

Keywords:
causalitycounterfactualseye trackingintuitive physicsmental simulationopen dataopen materials

Related Experiment Videos

  • Eye movement patterns indicated participants engaged in counterfactual simulation, mentally replaying scenarios.
  • Stronger causal judgments correlated with increased certainty that the outcome would differ in the counterfactual condition.
  • Direct evidence supports the spontaneous use of counterfactual simulation in cognition.

Conclusions:

  • Counterfactual simulation is a critical component of human causal judgment.
  • Findings support counterfactual theories over purely process-based accounts in this context.
  • This research provides empirical validation for counterfactual thinking in understanding cause-effect relationships.