Related Experiment Videos
The Single-Group, Pre- and Posttest Design in Nursing Education Research: It's Time to Move on
The Journal of Nursing Education
|February 1, 2018
Summary
The common single-group, pre- and posttest design offers weak evidence for nursing education interventions. Researchers should use stronger study designs to better support claims of intervention effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Education
- Educational Interventions Research
- Methodology in Health Professions Education
Background:
- The science of nursing education relies on effective educational interventions.
- The single-group, pre- and posttest design is frequently used but offers limited evidence.
- This design's limitations hinder robust conclusions about intervention effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline the limitations of the single-group, pre- and posttest design in nursing education research.
- To review the requirements for establishing stronger causal arguments in intervention studies.
- To encourage the adoption of superior study designs for nursing education research.
Main Methods:
- Critical review of common research designs in nursing education.
- Analysis of methodological requirements for causality.
- Discussion of alternative study designs and procedures.
Main Results:
- The single-group, pre- and posttest design provides insufficient evidence for intervention effectiveness.
- Establishing causality requires designs that control for confounding variables.
- Alternative designs can significantly strengthen claims of intervention effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Nursing education researchers must move beyond the single-group, pre- and posttest design.
- Employing rigorous study designs is crucial for advancing the science of nursing education.
- Stronger methodologies lead to more credible evidence of intervention impact.