Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Acute Kidney Injury Model Induced by Cisplatin in Adult Zebrafish
Published on: May 15, 2021
Strain differences in the development of cisplatin-induced pica behavior in mice
Kouichi Yamamoto1, Atsushi Yamatodani2
1Department of Medical Science and Technology, Division of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Introduction:
Pica behavior, kaolin ingestion, in rats and mice can be used as an assessment of nausea and vomiting; however, we observed that the incidence of pica behavior in ICR strain mice varied markedly. We investigated the susceptibility of four strains of mice (ICR, BALB/c, C57BL/6, and DBA/2) to the development of pica behavior.
Methods:
Mice received cisplatin (7.5 mg/kg, i.p.) with or without a serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (granisetron: 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) or tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist (fosaprepitant: 30 mg/kg, i.p.), and then their daily kaolin intake was measured for 2 days. We examined the expression of preprotachykinin (PPT)-A mRNA in the medulla of cisplatin-treated mice 8 and 32 h after drug administration.
Results:
All mice except for ICR strain significantly increased kaolin intake after cisplatin administration. Among the tested strains, DBA/2 mice compared to BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice notably showed pica behavior on both days (P < 0.0001). The expression of PPT-A mRNA was significantly increased 8 h after cisplatin administration in all strains, but the increase remained on the second day only in DBA/2 mice (P < 0.05). Granisetron significantly inhibited pica behavior in DBA/2 mice on the first day (P < 0.0001), but not the second day; however, fosaprepitant completely inhibited the pica behavior on both days (P < 0.001).
Discussion:
These results indicate that cisplatin-induced pica behavior in mice is likely to be influenced by the genotype, and that DBA/2 mice are useful to analyze the emetogenic or anti-emetic potential of drugs in preclinical studies.
Related Concept Videos
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
What is Behavior?
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...

