Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

8.3K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
8.3K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.3K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.3K
Bias01:22

Bias

7.4K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.4K
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs02:39

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs

10.0K
In humans, more than 80% of the genome gets transcribed. However, only around 2% of the genome codes for proteins. The remaining part produces non-coding RNAs which includes ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs, telomerase RNAs, and regulatory RNAs, among other types. A large number of regulatory non-coding RNAs have been classified into two groups depending upon their length – small non-coding RNAs, such as microRNA, which are less than 200 nucleotides in length, and long non-coding RNA...
10.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characterising the failure mechanisms of error-corrected quantum logic gates.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

How Contextuality and Antidistinguishability Are Related.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

Thresholds for Postselected Quantum Error Correction from Statistical Mechanics.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

High-fidelity spin qubit operation and algorithmic initialization above 1 K.

Nature·2024
Same author

The dawn of error correction with spin qubits.

Nature materials·2022
Same author

Low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum computing using long-range connectivity.

Science advances·2022
Same journal

Erratum: Bacterial Turbulence at Compressible Fluid Interfaces [Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 138301 (2026)].

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Unveiling Light-Quark Yukawa Flavor Structure via Dihadron Fragmentation at Lepton Colliders.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Adaptable Route to Fast Coherent State Transport via Bang-Bang-Bang Protocols.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Topological Transition and Emergence of Elasticity of Dislocation in Skyrmion Lattice: Beyond Kittel's Magnetic-Polar Analogy.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Pound-Drever-Hall Method for Superconducting-Qubit Readout.

Physical review letters·2026
Same journal

Coupling a ^{73}Ge Nuclear Spin to an Electrostatically Defined Quantum Dot in Silicon.

Physical review letters·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Rapid Determination of the Thermal Nociceptive Threshold in Diabetic Rats
05:45

Rapid Determination of the Thermal Nociceptive Threshold in Diabetic Rats

Published on: May 17, 2012

28.2K

Ultrahigh Error Threshold for Surface Codes with Biased Noise.

David K Tuckett1, Stephen D Bartlett1, Steven T Flammia1,2

  • 1Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Physical Review Letters
|February 27, 2018
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A modified surface code significantly boosts quantum error correction for biased noise, common in quantum computing. This tailored approach enhances qubit stability and performance, paving the way for more reliable quantum systems.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte
10:27

Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte

Published on: October 5, 2017

7.7K
Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores
09:43

Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores

Published on: October 31, 2013

14.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Rapid Determination of the Thermal Nociceptive Threshold in Diabetic Rats
05:45

Rapid Determination of the Thermal Nociceptive Threshold in Diabetic Rats

Published on: May 17, 2012

28.2K
Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte
10:27

Simultaneous Multi-surface Anodizations and Stair-like Reverse Biases Detachment of Anodic Aluminum Oxides in Sulfuric and Oxalic Acid Electrolyte

Published on: October 5, 2017

7.7K
Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores
09:43

Fine-tuning the Size and Minimizing the Noise of Solid-state Nanopores

Published on: October 31, 2013

14.2K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum Information Science
  • Quantum Computing
  • Error Correction Codes

Background:

  • Quantum error correction is crucial for building fault-tolerant quantum computers.
  • Many quantum architectures experience biased noise, with Pauli Z errors dominating (dephasing).
  • Standard surface codes may not optimally address such prevalent noise characteristics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate a modified surface code designed for biased noise environments.
  • To quantify the error correction threshold improvement for dominant Pauli Z errors.
  • To assess the performance against realistic noise bias ratios and compare with theoretical bounds.

Main Methods:

  • Implementation of a modified surface code using weight-4 stabilizers on a square lattice.
  • Measurement of Y-products instead of Z-products for enhanced syndrome bit generation.
  • Utilizing a tensor network decoder (Bravyi-Suchara-Vargo) for threshold calculation.
  • Analysis across various noise bias ratios, including pure dephasing.

Main Results:

  • Achieved an error correction threshold of 43.7(1)% in the limit of pure dephasing noise.
  • Demonstrated a substantial threshold of 28.2(2)% at a noise bias ratio of 10.
  • Observed performance consistently near the theoretical hashing bound across different bias levels.
  • The modification effectively doubles useful syndrome bits for dominant Z errors.

Conclusions:

  • Tailoring quantum error correction codes and decoders to specific noise models yields significant efficiency gains.
  • The modified surface code offers a practical and effective solution for architectures with dominant dephasing noise.
  • This approach respects the locality constraints inherent in topological quantum codes.