[Application of dysphonia severity index in laryngeal reflux related voice diseases]

Objective:To discuss the validity and reliability of dysphonia severity index in evaluating the effect of diagnosis and treatment of laryngeal reflux related voice diseases. Method:54 cases of voice disease patients accompanied by laryngopharyngeal reflux from January 2016 to June 2017 in department of otorhinolaryngology of our hospital were divided into two groups according to treatment type. 32 cases in the operation group received laser surgery and standard acid suppression therapy for 6 weeks, and 22 patients in the non-operation group received standard acid suppression therapy for 6 weeks. 24 h multichannel impedance pH (MCII-pH) monitoring was carried out. The indexes of reflux symptom, reflux finding score, subjective auditory perception and objective acoustic parameters of voice were measured before and after treatment, and the dysphonia severity index was calculated and analyzed. Result:There was no significant difference in age, sex and course of disease between the two groups (P> 0.05).Compared with pre-treatment, RSI, RFS, Jitter, Shimmer, G and R in two groups decreased significantly after treatment, and MPT, DSI increased significantly (P<0.05). Before treatment, RSI, RFS, Jitter, Shimmer, G and R in the operation group were significantly higher than those in the non-operation group, and MPT, DSI were lower (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in the parameters between the two groups after treatment (P> 0.05). DSI was negatively correlated with GRBAS scoring parameters, Jitter and Shimmer, and positively correlated with RSI, RFS, and MPT (P<0.01). DSI is related to the location of the lesion (P<0.05) The incidence of anxiety was 27.27% in patients with moderate and severe sudden sensorineural hearing loss, and the incidence of depression was 25.25%. The scores of anxiety and depression were statistically significant (P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the status of anxiety and depression was accompanied by symptoms and other diseases (P<0.05). There was a significant difference between the effective group, the significant efficacy group and the cured group (P<0.05). The difference between the scores before and after treatment was compared. Differences in the ineffective group compared with the other three groups, and the cured group compared with the other three groups of anxiety, depression were statistically significant. Conclusion:DSI can be used as an objective evaluation index for the diagnosis and treatment of laryngeal reflux related voice diseases, and it is accurate and reliable.