Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 10, 2026

Enema of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Published on: January 27, 2023
Hip resurfacing in patients with severe osteoarthritis and blocked medullary canal
1Wyss Hip and Pelvis Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Insights
Hip resurfacing is a successful alternative to conversion total hip replacement (CTHR) for patients with femoral deformities or retained implants. This canal-sparing approach offers improved outcomes and fewer complications.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Reconstructive surgery
- Biomaterials engineering
Background:
- Femoral deformities and retained implants pose challenges for traditional total hip replacement (THR).
- Conversion total hip replacement (CTHR) can involve increased operative time, blood loss, and complications, especially with intramedullary nail removal.
- Hip resurfacing offers a potential alternative with a blocked femoral canal, possibly simplifying the procedure and improving outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of hip resurfacing in patients with femoral deformities or retained femoral implants.
- To compare the perioperative complexity and functional outcomes of hip resurfacing versus CTHR in challenging cases.
- To assess implant survivorship and the need for revision surgery following hip resurfacing.
Main Methods:
- Hip resurfacing was performed in 61 patients (65 hips) with a blocked femur, who were previously advised against standard THR.
- Perioperative data including operative time and blood loss were recorded.
- Functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire.
- Implant survivorship was determined by the rate of revision surgery.
Main Results:
- At a mean follow-up of 9 years, 59 patients were evaluated.
- Mean operative time was 104 minutes, and mean blood loss was 300 cc.
- Significant improvements were observed in HHS (41 to 92) and SF-12 scores (physical: 26 to 49; mental: 44 to 54) (p < 0.001).
- No hip resurfacing procedures required revision surgery.
Conclusions:
- Canal-sparing hip resurfacing is a successful and less complicated option for patients with femoral canal blockage due to deformity or retained implants.
- This technique offers a viable alternative to CTHR, demonstrating excellent functional outcomes and long-term survivorship.
- Hip resurfacing in these complex cases leads to improved patient function and avoids the potential complications associated with CTHR.
Introduction:
This study evaluated the effectiveness of hip resurfacing in patients with femoral deformities or retained femoral implants. Implant removal and conversion total hip replacement (CTHR) have been associated with increased operative time, blood loss, and cost. Removing intramedullary nails in particular can be difficult and can result in a more difficult recovery and/or complications. Hip resurfacing can be performed with a blocked femoral canal and has the possible additional benefits of a less-complex procedure, improved functional outcomes, better patient survivorship, and a possibly less-complicated revision should a failure occur.
Materials And Methods:
The author performed hip resurfacing in 61 patients (65 hips) with a blocked femur who had been advised elsewhere that they could not undergo THR without also undergoing additional surgical procedures. The perioperative complexity of resurfacing was evaluated by recording operative time, blood loss and functional outcomes using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12) questionnaire. Implant survivorship was evaluated by the need for revision surgery.
Results:
At 9 years' mean follow-up (range 5-19 years), 59 of the 61 patients presented for postoperative evaluation. The mean operative time was 104 minutes and the mean blood loss was 300 cc. The mean HHS improved from 41 to 92 ( p < 0.001) and the mean SF-12 physical and mental scores improved from 26 to 49 and from 44 to 54, respectively ( p < 0.001). None of the procedures failed or required revision.
Conclusion:
Canal-sparing hip resurfacing is a successful and less complicated option than CTHR when there is deformity or retained implant blocking the femoral canal.
Related Concept Videos
Block Diagram Reduction
The first step in this process is the identification and relocation of a branch point. A branch point, where a...
Elements of Block Diagrams
A block diagram typically includes essential elements such as comparators, blocks, and feedback loops. Each of these elements...
Relation between Mathematical Equations and Block Diagrams
Patient-centered Care
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Drug Dosing: Obese Patients

