Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates
Published on: September 5, 2017
Quantitative Analysis of Heterogeneous [18F]FDG Static (SUV) vs. Patlak (Ki) Whole-body PET Imaging Using Different
Mingzan Zhuang1,2, Nicolas A Karakatsanis3,4, Rudi A J O Dierckx1
1Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Purpose:
Whole-body (WB) dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) enables imaging of highly quantitative physiological uptake parameters beyond the standardized uptake value (SUV). We present a novel dynamic WB anthropomorphic PET simulation framework to assess the potential of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose ([18F]FDG) net uptake rate constant (Ki) imaging in characterizing tumor heterogeneity.
Procedures:
Validated heterogeneous [18F]FDG tumor kinetics were modeled within the XCAT phantom (ground truth). Thereafter, static (SUV) and dynamic PET data were simulated and reconstructed, followed by indirect WB Patlak Ki imaging. Subsequently, we compared the methods of affinity propagation (AP) and automatic segmentation with active contour (MASAC) to evaluate the impact of tumor delineation. Finally, we extracted the metabolically active tumor volume (MATV), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and the intratumoral heterogeneity metrics of the area under the cumulative intensity histogram curve (CIHAUC), homogeneity, entropy, dissimilarity, high-intensity emphasis (HIE), and zone percentage (ZP), along with the target-to-background (TBR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR).
Results:
Ki images presented higher TBR but lower CNR compared to SUV. In contrast to MASAC, AP segmentation resulted in smaller bias for MATV and DSC scores in Ki compared to SUV images. All metrics, except for ZP, were significantly different in AP segmentation between SUV and Ki images, with significant correlation observed for MATV, homogeneity, dissimilarity, and entropy. With MASAC segmentation, CIHAUC, homogeneity, and dissimilarity were significantly different between SUV and Ki images, with all metrics, except for HIE and ZP, being significantly correlated. In ground truth images, increased heterogeneity was observed with Ki compared to SUV, with a high correlation for all metrics.
Conclusions:
A novel simulation framework was developed for the assessment of the quantitative benefits of WB Patlak PET on realistic heterogeneous tumor models. Quantitative analysis showed that WB Ki imaging may provide enhanced TBR and facilitate lesion segmentation and quantification beyond the SUV capabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Quantitative Analysis
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
Static Equilibrium - I
Static Equilibrium - II
Static Friction
For example, consider a scenario where a truck is connected to a car by a rope, ready to tow it along a road. When no external force is applied by the truck, the car remains stationary and is said to be in static equilibrium. In this case, the forces acting on the car, such as gravity and the...
Problem Solving in Statics
The physical situation and mathematical modeling must be considered; however, it is challenging to represent all physical situations using mathematical modeling. With the help of...
Statically Indeterminate Problem Solving
![Visualization and Quantification of Brown and Beige Adipose Tissues in Mice using [18F]FDG Micro-PET/MR Imaging](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F62460.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
