Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

10:36
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
Published on: August 3, 2018
12.6K
Invariant errors reveal limitations in motor correction rather than constraints on error sensitivity.
Hyosub E Kim1,2, J Ryan Morehead3, Darius E Parvin4,5
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. hyosubkim@berkeley.edu.
Communications Biology
|October 2, 2018
Summary
Implicit sensorimotor adaptation involves error reduction. Our study reveals learning is constrained by error correction size, not just error sensitivity, challenging current models.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Human Motor Learning
Background:
- Implicit sensorimotor adaptation is typically viewed as a gradual error reduction process.
- Current models explain adaptation based on sensitivity to movement errors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the constraints on implicit sensorimotor adaptation.
- To determine the relationship between error size and adaptive corrections.
- To explore asymptotic learning levels across different error magnitudes.
Main Methods:
- Studied healthy human participants performing movements with varying error sizes.
- Analyzed the relationship between movement error and adaptive corrections.
- Examined learning convergence to asymptotic levels.
Main Results:
- Adaptive correction size correlated with error size only for errors < 6°.
- Learning converged to similar asymptotic levels despite a wide range of error sizes.
- Current error-reduction models do not fully explain these findings.
Conclusions:
- Sensorimotor learning is constrained by the magnitude of error correction, not solely by error sensitivity.
- Findings necessitate a revised theoretical framework for implicit sensorimotor adaptation.
Related Concept Videos
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
1.1K
When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...
1.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error
9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Margin of Error
7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Standard Error of the Mean
12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K

