Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

"Magical thinking," suicide, and malpractice litigation.

H Bursztajn1, T G Gutheil, A Brodsky

  • 1Program in Psychiatry and the Law, Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston 02115.

The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

Legal assessments of suicide risk differ from clinical ones, often involving hindsight bias and focusing on the method. Understanding these courtroom reasoning errors can help clinicians prevent suicide and malpractice litigation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

LIPSS-based functional surfaces produced by multi-beam nanostructuring with 2601 beams and real-time thermal processes measurement.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Use of autologous dermal flap as mesh coverage in the treatment of large abdominal-wall defect in patients following massive weight loss: presentation of a novel surgical technique.

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery·2020
Same author

Differential effects of respiratory and electrical stimulation-induced dilator muscle contraction on mechanical properties of the pharynx in the pig.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2016
Same author

The stochastic nature of all radiation effects.

Health physics·2012
Same author

Adjunctive brivaracetam for refractory partial-onset seizures: a randomized, controlled trial.

Neurology·2010
Same author

E-mail and psychiatry: some psychotherapeutic and psychoanalytic perspectives.

American journal of psychotherapy·2008

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Medical Law

Background:

  • Retrospective legal assessments of suicidality in malpractice cases differ from prospective clinical evaluations.
  • Courtroom evaluations may exhibit hindsight bias, overemphasizing the foreseeability of suicide methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the discrepancies between clinical and legal assessments of suicidality.
  • To identify cognitive biases in legal contexts that impact clinician liability.
  • To propose strategies for suicide prevention and malpractice litigation avoidance.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of clinical and legal frameworks for assessing suicide risk.
  • Examination of cognitive biases, such as hindsight bias, in legal decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of parallels between courtroom reasoning and the mindset of suicidal patients.

    • Main Results:

    • Legal assessments in malpractice litigation often focus disproportionately on the method of suicide, particularly medication overdose.
    • Hindsight bias in legal settings can lead to an exaggerated perception of the suicide's foreseeability.
    • Cognitive errors in legal reasoning mirror aspects of the suicidal patient's mindset.

    Conclusions:

    • Understanding the dynamics of legal reasoning errors is crucial for clinicians.
    • Clinicians can implement precautions to mitigate risks of both suicide and malpractice litigation.
    • Bridging the gap between clinical and legal perspectives enhances patient safety and professional defense.