Nondestructive Mapping of Long-Range Dislocation Strain Fields in an Epitaxial Complex Metal Oxide
Hugh Simons1, Anders Clemen Jakobsen1, Sonja Rosenlund Ahl1
1Department of Physics , Technical University of Denmark , Kgs. Lyngby 2800 , Denmark.
Nano Letters
|February 7, 2019
Summary
Misfit dislocations in ferroic oxides create strain fields impacting device performance. Dark-field X-ray microscopy precisely quantifies these weak, long-range strains and associated charge heterogeneities in bismuth ferrite films.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Nanotechnology
Background:
- Heteroepitaxial interfaces generate misfit dislocations, causing strain fields beyond epitaxial strain.
- Strong lattice coupling in ferroic oxides, like bismuth ferrite, leads to unpredictable functionality due to these strain fields.
- Understanding strain distribution is crucial for optimizing device performance in advanced materials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To map and quantify lattice distortions around misfit dislocations in epitaxial bismuth ferrite films.
- To investigate the impact of dislocation components (screw and edge) on strain and charge heterogeneities.
- To establish physical limitations on device scaling and material design in epitaxial systems.
Main Methods:
- Utilized dark-field X-ray microscopy for high-resolution imaging of lattice distortions.
- Employed strain quantification techniques to measure weak, long-ranging strain fields without altering the film's mechanical state.
- Isolated screw and edge dislocation components to analyze their individual contributions.
Main Results:
- Precisely quantified weak, long-ranging strain fields and symmetry lowering around misfit dislocations.
- Demonstrated that screw and edge dislocations induce charge heterogeneities through flexoelectric coupling.
- Observed measurable charge and strain heterogeneities extending over mesoscopic scales, even with small lattice mismatches and stress relief mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- Misfit dislocations significantly impact ferroic oxide properties, even under conditions of small lattice mismatch and stress relief.
- Flexoelectric coupling plays a key role in generating charge heterogeneities from strain fields.
- Findings impose stricter physical limitations on device size, dislocation density, and lattice mismatch in epitaxial systems.
Related Concept Videos
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
30.8K
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
30.8K
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
48.4K
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
48.4K
Metal-Ligand Bonds
24.2K
The hemoglobin in the blood, the chlorophyll in green plants, vitamin B-12, and the catalyst used in the manufacture of polyethylene all contain coordination compounds. Ions of the metals, especially the transition metals, are likely to form complexes.
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
24.2K
Properties of Transition Metals
29.8K
Transition metals are defined as those elements that have partially filled d orbitals. As shown in Figure 1, the d-block elements in groups 3–12 are transition elements. The f-block elements, also called inner transition metals (the lanthanides and actinides), also meet this criterion because the d orbital is partially occupied before the f orbitals.
29.8K
Oxidation Numbers
42.5K
In redox reactions, the transfer of electrons occurs between reacting species. Electron transfer is described by a hypothetical number called the oxidation number (or oxidation state). It represents the effective charge of an atom or element, which is assigned using a set of rules.
42.5K
Alkali Metals
24.5K
Group 1 elements are soft and shiny metallic solids. They are malleable, ductile, and good conductors of heat and electricity. The melting points of the alkali metals are unusually low for metals and decrease going down the group, while the density increases going down the group with the exception of potassium (Table 1).
Table 1: Properties of the alkali metals
Table 1: Properties of the alkali metals
24.5K


