Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 26, 2026

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
Published on: March 27, 2019
Assessing the relationship between self-reported driving behaviors and driver risk using a naturalistic driving study
1College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 201804, China; The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, 201804, China; National Engineering Laboratory for Integrated Optimization of Road Traffic and Safety Analysis Technologies, 88 Qianrong Rd, Wuxi 214151, China.
Drivers engaging in inattention errors and ordinary violations, like running red lights, are more likely to be involved in crashes and near crashes (CNCs). Aggressive and ordinary violations also increase the risk of being a high- or moderate-risk driver.
Area of Science:
- Traffic Psychology
- Road Safety Research
- Behavioral Science
Background:
- The Manchester Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) identifies risky driving behaviors linked to psychological factors.
- Understanding the connection between driver behaviors and crash risk is crucial for developing effective safety interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between self-reported driving behaviors and involvement in crashes and near crashes (CNCs).
- To assess how specific risky behaviors correlate with an individual driver's CNC risk.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Shanghai Naturalistic Driving Study (45 males, 12 females, mean age 38.7).
- Employed K-mean clustering to categorize drivers into high-, moderate-, and low-risk CNC groups.
- Applied Principal Component Analysis to the DBQ (24 items) revealing five factors: aggressive violations, ordinary violations, lapses, inattention errors, and inexperience errors.
- Developed logistic regression models to analyze the correlation between DBQ components and CNC levels.
Main Results:
- High-risk drivers showed a significantly higher propensity for inattention errors (e.g., missing signs) and ordinary violations (e.g., running red lights).
- Aggressive violations and ordinary violations were positively associated with being a high- or moderate-risk driver.
Conclusions:
- Inattention errors and ordinary violations are key indicators of higher crash and near-crash involvement.
- Targeting aggressive and ordinary violations in driver education and road safety strategies can mitigate risks for high- and moderate-risk drivers.
Related Concept Videos
Energy to Drive Translocation
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
M-Cdk Drives Transition Into Mitosis
Cyclin-dependent kinases, or Cdks, work in concert with cyclins to control cell cycle transitions. M-Cdk, a complex of Cdk1 bound to M cyclin, is a well-known example of this coordinated control that drives the transition from the G2 to the M phase.
M cyclin...
Naturalistic Observations
Drive-Reduction Theory: Push Theory of Motivation
Relationship Formation
Ending Relationships

