Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.9K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.9K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

7.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
7.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

3.0K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

62.4K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
62.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic investigation of the LSPR characteristics in plasmonic nanoarrays.

Microsystems & nanoengineering·2026
Same author

Geometry-Engineered Pd-Au Plasmonic Nanoarrays: Unveiling Design Principles for High-Performance Hydrogen Sensing.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Morphology-adaptive Au-Ag nanowire elastronics for integrated FlexoSERS and bioelectrical sensing.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Challenges and Prospects of Personalized Healthcare Based on Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.

Research (Washington, D.C.)·2025
Same author

Interwoven MXene Sediment Architecture Empowers High-Performance Flexible Microwave Devices.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Unveiling the Cation Effects on Electrocatalytic CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction via Operando Surface-enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same journal

Self-Powered Fine Dust Filtration Using Triboelectrification-Induced Electric Field.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Bio-distribution of Carbon Nanoparticles Studied by Photoacoustic Measurements.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Effects of High-Temperature Growth of Dislocation Filter Layers in GaAs-on-Si.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Correction: Assembly of Carbon Dots into Frameworks with Enhanced Stability and Antibacterial Activity.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Improved Subthreshold Characteristics by Back-Gate Coupling on Ferroelectric ETSOI FETs.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
Same journal

Gold Nanoparticles Enhancing Generation of ROS for Cs-137 Radiotherapy.

Nanoscale research letters·2022
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics
09:12

Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics

Published on: May 28, 2016

11.6K

Spin-Independent Plasmonic Lens.

Guoqun Li1, Yuqing Sun1, Sen Wang2

  • 1Shandong Provincial Engineering and Technical Center of Light Manipulations & Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Optics and Photonic Device, College of Physics and Electronics, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250014, China.

Nanoscale Research Letters
|May 9, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers achieved spin-independent surface plasmon polariton (SPP) focusing by balancing spiral phases in plasmonic lenses. This breakthrough overcomes spin-state dependency in SPP devices, ensuring consistent focusing regardless of light spin.

Keywords:
FocusingSpinSpiral phaseSurface plasmonsTransverse shift

More Related Videos

Plasmonic Trapping and Release of Nanoparticles in a Monitoring Environment
09:13

Plasmonic Trapping and Release of Nanoparticles in a Monitoring Environment

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.0K
Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher
05:14

Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher

Published on: February 23, 2018

7.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics
09:12

Colloidal Synthesis of Nanopatch Antennas for Applications in Plasmonics and Nanophotonics

Published on: May 28, 2016

11.6K
Plasmonic Trapping and Release of Nanoparticles in a Monitoring Environment
09:13

Plasmonic Trapping and Release of Nanoparticles in a Monitoring Environment

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.0K
Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher
05:14

Simulating the Mechanics of Lens Accommodation via a Manual Lens Stretcher

Published on: February 23, 2018

7.2K

Area of Science:

  • Plasmonics
  • Nanophotonics
  • Optics

Background:

  • Semicircular plasmonic lenses typically exhibit spin-dependent surface plasmon polariton (SPP) focusing due to spiral phase properties.
  • This spin-dependency complicates the control and application of SPPs in optical devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a method for achieving SPP focusing that is independent of the spin states of the incident light.
  • To investigate the underlying physics and robustness of spin-independent SPP focusing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized counterbalancing spiral and Pancharatnam-Berry phases to negate spin-dependent effects.
  • Employed Huygens-Fresnel principle analysis for SPPs.
  • Conducted numerical simulations to validate focusing characteristics.

Main Results:

  • Successfully realized SPP focusing independent of excitation light's spin states.
  • Demonstrated identical SPP focus position, intensity, and profile for different spin states.
  • Confirmed that the spin-independent focusing is robust against variations in the semicircular slit's geometry (radius, central angle, shape).

Conclusions:

  • The study elucidates the mechanism behind spin-dependent SPP focusing.
  • Provides practical strategies to achieve spin-independent SPP focusing, enhancing the stability and applicability of plasmonic devices.
  • Offers a pathway to mitigate the influence of light spin on SPP fields.