Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Stimulating the Lip Motor Cortex with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: June 14, 2014
Localization of Sensorimotor Cortex Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Magnetoencephalography
Minna Pitkänen1,2,3, Shogo Yazawa4, Katja Airaksinen5,6,7
1Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland. minna.pitk@gmail.com.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is more effective than magnetoencephalography (MEG) for mapping sensorimotor cortex areas. TMS provided more consistent results across participants compared to MEG methods like corticomuscular coherence (CMC).
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Brain Mapping
Background:
- Sensorimotor cortex mapping is crucial for understanding motor and sensory functions.
- Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are common mapping techniques.
- Direct comparisons of TMS and MEG mapping precision are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the precision and reliability of TMS and MEG for sensorimotor cortex mapping.
- To investigate the differences in localization accuracy between TMS and MEG-derived measures.
- To determine the viability of TMS versus MEG in clinical and research settings.
Main Methods:
- Mapped TMS center of gravities (CoGs) and MEG somatosensory evoked fields (SEFs) in ten healthy adults.
- Measured corticomuscular coherence (CMC) and corticokinematic coherence (CKC) during voluntary muscle activity and finger waving.
- Compared localization data from TMS (FDI, ECR muscles) and MEG (index finger stimulation, muscle activation).
Main Results:
- TMS-inferred localizations (CoGs) showed less inter-participant variability than MEG-inferred localizations (CMC, CKC).
- MEG measures (CMC, CKC) exhibited greater distances between muscle representations compared to TMS.
- MEG SEF locations were, on average, 8 mm lateral to TMS CoGs (p < 0.01).
Conclusions:
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) appears more viable than magnetoencephalography (MEG) for precise sensorimotor cortex localization.
- TMS offers greater consistency across individuals for mapping motor cortical areas.
- Further research can refine the integration of TMS and MEG for comprehensive brain mapping.
More Related Videos
11:11Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Published on: September 23, 2017
09:30Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment
Published on: May 23, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Association Areas of the Cortex
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
Motor and Sensory Areas of the Cortex
Motor Areas
The motor areas located in the frontal lobe are central to controlling voluntary movements. This region is further subdivided into the primary motor cortex and the premotor cortex....
Local Attraction
Magnetism
An individual magnetic pole cannot be isolated. No matter how small, every piece of a magnet contains a north pole and a south...
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...