Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parallel Resonance01:23

Parallel Resonance

533
The parallel RLC circuit is an arrangement where the resistor (R), inductor (L), and capacitor (C) are all connected to the same nodes and, as a result, share the same voltage across them. The parallel RLC circuit is analyzed in terms of admittance (Y), which reflects the ease with which current can flow. The admittance is given by:
533
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

652
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
652
Resistors In Parallel01:23

Resistors In Parallel

5.9K
Resistors are in parallel when one end of all the resistors are connected to a continuous wire of negligible resistance and the other end of all the resistors are also connected to one another through a continuous wire of negligible resistance. In the case of a parallel configuration, the potential drop across each resistor is the same. Current through each resistor can be found using Ohm’s law, I = V/R, where the voltage is constant across each resistor. The sum of the individual currents...
5.9K
Series and Parallel Capacitors01:14

Series and Parallel Capacitors

9.1K
Capacitors, fundamental components in electronic circuits, can be connected in series and/or parallel configurations. Each configuration has different impacts on the overall behavior of the circuit.
First, consider capacitors connected in series to a battery. In this configuration, the plate connected to the battery's positive terminal develops a positive charge, while the plate attached to the negative terminal becomes negatively charged. An equal magnitude of charge is induced on the...
9.1K
Parallel-axis Theorem01:06

Parallel-axis Theorem

8.2K
The parallel-axis theorem provides a convenient and quick method of finding the moment of inertia of an object about an axis parallel to the axis passing through its center of mass. Consider a thin rod as an example. There is a striking similarity between the process of finding the moment of inertia of a thin rod about an axis through its middle, where the center of mass lies, and about an axis through its end using the conventional method. In the conventional method, the concept of linear mass...
8.2K
Series and Parallel Inductors01:17

Series and Parallel Inductors

1.1K
In electrical circuits, integrating inductors into the toolkit of passive elements requires navigating the intricacies of series and parallel combinations involving these components. Practical circuits often feature configurations of multiple inductors, and understanding how to determine their equivalent inductance is vital.
For a series connection of N inductors, each carrying the same current, applying Kirchhoff's voltage law unveils a crucial relationship. Substituting the expression for...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Effects of flanker size and flanker eccentricity on the spatial integration of orthographic information.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

The impact of case changes on transposed-word effects.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

What drives regressions in reading? Insights from surprisal and saliency from language models.

Cognition·2026
Same author

A confound-free method to manipulate pupil size in psychological experiments.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Reexamining Transposed-Word Effects in the Grammatical Decision Task.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same journal

Geographical psychology: Spatial variation in psychological phenomena and their consequences.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Evaluation of the Impact of a New Cooling Cell Processor System on Islet Cell Isolation Facility
05:21

Evaluation of the Impact of a New Cooling Cell Processor System on Islet Cell Isolation Facility

Published on: August 11, 2023

537

Readers Are Parallel Processors.

Joshua Snell1, Jonathan Grainger1

  • 1Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, France; Institute of Language, Communication and the Brain, France; Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|May 30, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Research suggests words are read one by one, but eye-tracking alone cannot resolve the serial versus parallel processing debate. New evidence supports parallel processing in reading, requiring advanced methods to understand cognitive reading architecture.

Keywords:
attentionorthographic processingparallel processingreadingsyntactic processingword position coding

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Developing Parmodulins to Target Protease-Activated Receptors for Inflammation Control
07:13

Author Spotlight: Developing Parmodulins to Target Protease-Activated Receptors for Inflammation Control

Published on: May 24, 2024

945
Ubiquitin Chain Analysis by Parallel Reaction Monitoring
08:33

Ubiquitin Chain Analysis by Parallel Reaction Monitoring

Published on: June 17, 2020

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 24, 2026

Evaluation of the Impact of a New Cooling Cell Processor System on Islet Cell Isolation Facility
05:21

Evaluation of the Impact of a New Cooling Cell Processor System on Islet Cell Isolation Facility

Published on: August 11, 2023

537
Author Spotlight: Developing Parmodulins to Target Protease-Activated Receptors for Inflammation Control
07:13

Author Spotlight: Developing Parmodulins to Target Protease-Activated Receptors for Inflammation Control

Published on: May 24, 2024

945
Ubiquitin Chain Analysis by Parallel Reaction Monitoring
08:33

Ubiquitin Chain Analysis by Parallel Reaction Monitoring

Published on: June 17, 2020

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience of reading
  • Computational linguistics

Background:

  • Traditional reading research often assumes serial word processing.
  • Eye-movement tracking is the primary method for testing reading theories.
  • The serial versus parallel processing debate remains unresolved.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the conclusions drawn from the absence of effects in eye-tracking studies.
  • To argue for the necessity of methods beyond eye-tracking for resolving the debate.
  • To present evidence supporting parallel processing in reading.

Main Methods:

  • Critically evaluating existing eye-movement data.
  • Reviewing recent theoretical considerations of linguistic input processing.
  • Proposing new methodologies for inferring cognitive reading architecture.

Main Results:

  • The absence of observed effects in eye-tracking does not preclude parallel processing.
  • Recent research outside traditional text reading complicates serial processing models.
  • Phenomena suggest that parallel processing may be a more accurate model.

Conclusions:

  • Eye-tracking limitations prevent definitive conclusions on serial versus parallel reading.
  • Parallel processing is a viable and increasingly supported model of reading.
  • Advanced cognitive and computational methods are needed to fully understand reading architecture.