Conical Intersections in Organic Molecules: Benchmarking Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent DFT (MRSF-TD-DFT)
Seunghoon Lee1, Svetlana Shostak2, Michael Filatov2
1Department of Chemistry , Seoul National University , Seoul 151-747 , South Korea.
The Journal of Physical Chemistry. A
|July 9, 2019
Summary
The new mixed-reference spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (MRSF-TD-DFT) method accurately optimizes molecular geometries at conical intersections. This advancement simplifies calculations and improves reliability for organic molecules.
Area of Science:
- Quantum Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
- Theoretical Chemistry
Background:
- Spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (SF-TD-DFT) suffers from spin contamination.
- Existing methods struggle to accurately describe conical intersections in organic molecules.
Purpose of the Study:
- Introduce and validate the mixed-reference spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory (MRSF-TD-DFT) method.
- Enable automatic geometry optimization of targeted states, specifically S1/S0 conical intersections.
- Compare MRSF-TD-DFT accuracy with established ab initio methods.
Main Methods:
- Application of the MRSF-TD-DFT method for geometry optimization.
- Calculation of analytic gradients for MRSF-TD-DFT response states.
- Optimization of S1/S0 conical intersections in typical organic molecules.
Main Results:
- MRSF-TD-DFT successfully produces the correct double-cone topology of conical intersections.
- The method accurately describes the geometry and relative energies of lowest-energy conical intersections.
- MRSF-TD-DFT achieves accuracy comparable to high-level multireference wavefunction ab initio methods.
Conclusions:
- MRSF-TD-DFT overcomes spin contamination issues present in SF-TD-DFT.
- The method enables reliable automatic geometry optimization and molecular dynamics simulations.
- MRSF-TD-DFT offers a robust alternative to single-reference methods for describing conical intersections.
Related Concept Videos
Relation of DFT to z-Transform
796
The Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) is a crucial tool for analyzing the frequency content of discrete-time signals. It converts a sequence of N samples from the time domain into its corresponding sequence in the frequency domain, where each sample represents a specific frequency component.
To understand how the DFT works, it's helpful to consider the z-transform, which is a method for representing discrete sequences in the complex frequency domain. The z-transform involves summing the...
To understand how the DFT works, it's helpful to consider the z-transform, which is a method for representing discrete sequences in the complex frequency domain. The z-transform involves summing the...
796
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
1.5K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.5K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
3.0K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
3.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
1.5K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
1.5K

![Measuring the Spin-Lattice Relaxation Magnetic Field Dependence of Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F59399.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
