Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 21, 2026

Automated Protocols for Macromolecular Crystallization at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Published on: January 24, 2018
Total Laboratory Automation: What Is Gained, What Is Lost, and Who Can Afford It?
Richard B Thomson1, Erin McElvania2
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University Health System, 2650 Ridge Avenue, Evanston, IL 60201, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Abstract:
The first clinical microbiology laboratory in the United States adopted total automation for bacteriology processing in 2014. Since then, others have followed with installation of either the BD Kiestra TLA or the Copan WASPLab. This article discusses commercially available automated systems in the United States; why automation is needed; and quality improvements, efficiency, and cost savings associated with automation. After learning how these systems are used, gains and losses experienced, and how one can afford the most expensive equipment ever purchased for clinical microbiology laboratories, the question is, how can one afford not to purchase one of these microbiology automation systems?
Related Concept Videos
Gain
Gain:
Suppose Vin is the input and Vout is the output signal to a circuit.
Total Voids in Concrete
Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy
Static, Stagnation, Dynamic and Total Pressure
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Distribution Reliability and Automation

