Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026
Mitigating Lemons Problem III: Truthful Quality Reporting
Published on: March 27, 2025
Judging Truth
Nadia M Brashier1, Elizabeth J Marsh2
1Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA;
Abstract:
Deceptive claims surround us, embedded in fake news, advertisements, political propaganda, and rumors. How do people know what to believe? Truth judgments reflect inferences drawn from three types of information: base rates, feelings, and consistency with information retrieved from memory. First, people exhibit a bias to accept incoming information, because most claims in our environments are true. Second, people interpret feelings, like ease of processing, as evidence of truth. And third, people can (but do not always) consider whether assertions match facts and source information stored in memory. This three-part framework predicts specific illusions (e.g., truthiness, illusory truth), offers ways to correct stubborn misconceptions, and suggests the importance of converging cues in a post-truth world, where falsehoods travel further and faster than the truth.
Related Concept Videos
Mitigating Lemons Problem III: Truthful Quality Reporting
Surveys
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Nonconscious Mimicry Occurs when Affiliation Goals are Present
People are social chameleons and regularly engage in nonconscious behavioral mimicry. This occurs when an individual unwittingly imitates the behaviors of another person, such as crossing one's legs moments after a person sitting adjacent does so, or adjusting one's body posture to match a conversation partner. Rapport between two people increases behavioral mimicry, just as mimicry also increases rapport. Psychologists have...
09:11Automation of the Micronucleus Assay Using Imaging Flow Cytometry and Artificial Intelligence
Self-Schemas

