Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 19, 2026

Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: August 18, 2016
Quantification of Myocardial Mass Subtended by a Coronary Stenosis Using Intracoronary Physiology
Tadashi Murai1, Tim P van de Hoef1, Thomas P W van den Boogert1,2
1Heart Center, Amsterdam UMC, the Netherlands (T.M., T.P.v.d.H., T.P.W.v.d.B., G.W.M.W., V.E.S., J.P.S.H., J.J.P.).
Background:
In patients with stable coronary artery disease, the amount of myocardium subtended by coronary stenoses constitutes a major determinant of prognosis, as well as of the benefit of coronary revascularization. We devised a novel method to estimate partial myocardial mass (PMM; ie, the amount of myocardium subtended by a stenosis) during physiological stenosis interrogation. Subsequently, we validated the index against equivalent PMM values derived from applying the Voronoi algorithm on coronary computed tomography angiography.
Methods:
Based on the myocardial metabolic demand and blood supply, PMM was calculated as follows: PMM (g)=APV×D2×π/(1.24×10-3×HR×sBP+1.6), where APV indicates average peak blood flow velocity; D, vessel diameter; HR, heart rate; and sBP, systolic blood pressure. We calculated PMM to 43 coronary vessels (32 patients) interrogated with pressure and Doppler guidewires, and compared it with computed tomography-based PMM.
Results:
Median PMM was 15.8 g (Q1, Q3: 11.7, 28.4 g) for physiology-based PMM, and 17.0 g (Q1, Q3: 12.5, 25.9 g) for computed tomography-based PMM (P=0.84). Spearman rank correlation coefficient was 0.916 (P<0.001), and Passing-Bablok analysis revealed absence of both constant and proportional differences (coefficient A: -0.9; 95% CI, -4.5 to 0.9; and coefficient B, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.25]. Bland-Altman analysis documented a mean bias of 0.5 g (limit of agreement: -9.1 to 10.2 g).
Conclusions:
Physiology-based calculation of PMM in the catheterization laboratory is feasible and can be accurately performed as part of functional stenosis assessment.
Related Concept Videos
06:39Intracoronary Acetylcholine Provocation Testing for Assessment of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
06:39Novel Percutaneous Approach for Deployment of 3D Printed Coronary Stenosis Implants in Swine Models of Ischemic Heart Disease
07:59Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
06:32Evaluation of Coronary Flow Reserve After Myocardial Ischemia Reperfusion in Rats
06:18Measurement of Myocardial Lactate Production for Diagnosis of Coronary Microvascular Spasm

