Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Phenomapping of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction using machine learning-based
Matthew W Segar1, Kershaw V Patel1, Colby Ayers1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Unsupervised clustering identified three heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) phenogroups. Phenogroup 1 showed the highest risk for adverse outcomes, while Phenogroup 3 had the most favorable profile.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biostatistics
- Machine Learning in Medicine
Background:
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous condition.
- Identifying distinct HFpEF subgroups is crucial for targeted therapies and improved patient outcomes.
- Previous attempts to stratify HFpEF patients have faced challenges due to data complexity and heterogeneity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To apply unsupervised clustering analysis to a high-dimensional, mixed-data cohort of HFpEF patients.
- To identify distinct phenotypic subgroups within the HFpEF population.
- To evaluate the differential clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes associated with identified HFpEF phenogroups.
Main Methods:
- Utilized penalized finite mixture model-based clustering on 61 phenotypic variables from 654 Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT) participants.
- Characterized three distinct HFpEF phenogroups based on co-morbidities, natriuretic peptides, and left ventricular structure/function.
- Validated findings in an internal TOPCAT cohort (n=1113) and an external RELAX trial cohort (n=198) using adjusted Cox models.
Main Results:
- Phenogroup 1 exhibited a high burden of co-morbidities and cardiac abnormalities, associated with significantly higher risks of adverse events, mortality, and HF hospitalization.
- Phenogroup 2 showed lower co-morbidities but higher diastolic dysfunction, linked to increased HF hospitalization risk but lower atherosclerotic event risk.
- Phenogroup 3 presented with lower natriuretic peptides, intermediate co-morbidities, and favorable diastolic function, serving as the reference group for lower adverse outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning-based cluster analysis effectively identifies HFpEF phenogroups with distinct clinical profiles.
- These identified phenogroups demonstrate significantly different long-term clinical outcomes, highlighting HFpEF heterogeneity.
- The findings support the potential for personalized medicine approaches in managing HFpEF based on identified patient subgroups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure I: Introduction

