Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

09:30
Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment
Published on: May 23, 2025
1.2K
Finger Tapping Task Activation vs. TMS Hotspot: Different Locations and Networks.
Jue Wang1, Hai-Jiang Meng1, Gong-Jun Ji2,3
1School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Brain Topography
|November 7, 2019
Summary
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) show different motor area localizations. TMS targeting fMRI activation may enhance treatment for movement disorders.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Brain Imaging
Background:
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are non-invasive tools for localizing human motor areas.
- Clinical applications of TMS treatment often use these localized areas as stimulation targets.
- Previous studies noted discrepancies between finger tapping fMRI activation and TMS hotspots.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the spatial distance between finger tapping fMRI activation and TMS hotspots.
- To compare the functional brain networks associated with each localization method using resting-state fMRI.
- To inform optimal targeting strategies for TMS in clinical applications.
Main Methods:
- Thirty healthy participants underwent resting-state fMRI, task-based fMRI (finger tapping), and TMS hotspot localization.
- Spatial distance analysis was performed between fMRI activation peaks and TMS hotspots.
- Resting-state functional connectivity was analyzed using fMRI activation peaks and TMS hotspots as seeds.
Main Results:
- A significant spatial difference was observed between finger tapping fMRI activation and TMS hotspots.
- Finger tapping fMRI activation was located more laterally within the premotor area compared to the TMS hotspot.
- Resting-state fMRI revealed more intensive functional connectivity for the fMRI activation peak with areas including the premotor cortex, insula, putamen, and globus pallidus.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights spatial and network differences between fMRI-identified motor areas and TMS hotspots.
- Targeting TMS based on fMRI activation may yield broader network effects.
- This approach could potentially improve TMS efficacy for treating movement disorders.

