Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

356
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
356
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K
Purpose of Health Records I01:11

Purpose of Health Records I

1.7K
The vital purpose of health records is to provide a complete and accurate account of a patient's medical history, including communication, diagnostic and therapeutic orders, care planning, research, and quality review.
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
1.7K
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

15.4K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
15.4K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

821
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
821
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

10.1K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reversal of Pharmacologic Mydriasis in Pediatric Subjects with Ryzumvi (0.75% Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution): A Post-Hoc Pooled Analysis from Three Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Trials.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)·2026
Same author

Basic Science and Pathogenesis.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

In Memoriam: Michael Albert Lemp.

Cornea·2025
Same author

Reply.

Ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Assessing Ocular Dominance: Rethinking the Current Paradigm.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2025
Same author

Reversal of Pharmacologically Induced Mydriasis with Phentolamine Ophthalmic Solution.

Ophthalmology·2024
Same journal

Reply to Comment on Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients with Delayed Follow-Up.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Comment on: "Safety and efficiency reducing retinopathy of prematurity guideline sensitivity: an external validation using a large US-based dataset".

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Reply to Comment on "Clinicopathological and Imaging Distinction Between Ocular Adnexal MALT Lymphoma and IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease".

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Comment on: Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Patients With Delayed Follow-Up.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Corneal sensitivity changes and nerve plexus abnormalities in noninfectious anterior uveitis.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Role of Menopausal Hormone Therapy on Strabismus, Strabismus Surgery, and Reoperation Rates.

American journal of ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K

Perspective on Systematic Medical Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Jay S Pepose1, Gary N Foulks2, J Daniel Nelson3

  • 1Pepose Vision Institute and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

American Journal of Ophthalmology
|December 8, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) in ophthalmology sometimes include flawed science due to issues in peer review. Addressing author, reviewer, and editor practices is crucial for improving SRMA accuracy.

More Related Videos

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.4K
Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 2, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.4K
Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
04:34

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Literature Analysis
  • Scientific Publishing

Background:

  • Established guidelines exist for designing, conducting, and assessing systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs).
  • Despite guidelines, recent ophthalmology literature reveals significant shortcomings in SRMAs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify factors contributing to the inadequacies of published ophthalmology systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs).
  • To analyze the causes of these inadequacies and propose corrective actions.

Main Methods:

  • A review and synthesis of selective literature.
  • Interpretation and expert perspective on identified issues.

Main Results:

  • Identified failings include the inclusion of refuted science in SRMAs.
  • Lack of citation for post-publication correspondence and inadequate search strategies were noted.
  • Problems stem from authors, peer reviewers, and journal editors.

Conclusions:

  • The perpetuation of erroneous science is a significant issue within medical literature and subsequent SRMAs.
  • Specific corrective actions are recommended to enhance the quality and accuracy of ophthalmology SRMAs.
  • Improving peer review processes is essential to prevent the inclusion of flawed research.