Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 20, 2025

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Characteristics of Contemporary Randomized Clinical Trials and Their Association With the Trial Funding Source in
Mario Gaudino1, Irbaz Hameed1, Mohamed Rahouma1
1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Commercial sponsorship in cardiovascular trials is linked to biased reporting of favorable outcomes. These randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are often small, with short follow-up, impacting evidence-based practice.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Medical Device Research
Background:
- High-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are crucial for evidence-based practice and guideline development.
- Commercial entities frequently fund, design, conduct, and report on clinical trials, necessitating an analysis of their influence.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the design, outcomes, and reporting of recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in invasive cardiovascular interventions.
- To determine the association between trial funding sources (specifically commercial sponsorship) and study characteristics and results.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional analysis of published RCTs in interventional cardiology and cardiovascular/vascular surgery from January 1, 2008, to May 31, 2019.
- Evaluation of trial characteristics, statistical significance of primary endpoints, reporting of implied treatment advantages, discrepancies between registered and published outcomes, and the sensitivity of results to small changes in patient outcomes.
- Assessment of the association between commercial sponsorship and these measures.
Main Results:
- Of 216 RCTs, 53.2% had commercial sponsorship. Trials were often small (median 502 patients) with short follow-up (median 12 months).
- Commercial sponsorship was significantly associated with reporting favorable outcomes (OR 2.80) and inconsistent findings.
- Discrepancies between registered and published primary outcomes occurred in 38.0% of trials, irrespective of sponsorship. Commercial sponsorship was linked to a higher number of patients needed to change significance (OR 1.29).
Conclusions:
- Contemporary RCTs in invasive cardiovascular interventions are often underpowered, small, and have limited follow-up.
- Commercial sponsorship appears linked to differences in trial design, outcome reporting, and potentially biased results, influencing the evidence base.
More Related Videos
04:53A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
08:49Author Spotlight: Enhancing Graft Viability Assessment Through Quantitative Metrics and Innovative Reservoir Systems
Published on: August 2, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Cardiovascular Drugs: Classification based on Therapeutic Indications
Blinding