Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The effects of the "living high-training low" model on key proteins involved in cellular aerobic and anaerobic metabolism in male C57BL/6J mice.

Physiological reports·2026

Same author

Six Weeks of Baker's Yeast β-Glucan Supplementation Reveals Unique Immune Maturation mRNA Signature: Implications for Immunity?

International journal of molecular sciences·2026

Same author

Effects of Consecutive Long-Haul Travel on Jet-Lag Symptoms: Case Study of a National Water Polo Team Preparing for World-Class Events.

International journal of sports physiology and performance·2025

Same author

Comparing the Bioavailability of Two Seawater-Derived Magnesium Preparations.

Journal of medicinal food·2025

Same author

Low intrinsic capacity is associated with a blunted exercise-induced cognitive enhancement in physically active middle-aged and older adults.

Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)·2025

Same author

MSM Supplementation Is Associated with Reduced Inflammation and Improved Innate Immune Response following In Vitro LPS-Stimulation in Humans after a Bout of Downhill Running.

Muscles (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Same journal

How Long Is Too Long? Effects of Mobile Game Duration on Stress and Cognitive Function by Gender.

International journal of exercise science·2026

Same journal

Effects of Inner Monologue Swearing on Physical Performance.

International journal of exercise science·2026

Same journal

Does Performing Partial Repetitions Beyond Momentary Failure Enhance Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Load-Equated Calf-Raise Resistance Training?

International journal of exercise science·2026

Same journal

Effects of Caffeine on NFL Combine-Like Tests in Undergraduate Students.

International journal of exercise science·2026

Same journal

The Impact of Chronic Ankle Instability on Functional and Perceived Single-leg Balance Control.

International journal of exercise science·2026

Same journal

Maximum-Speed Warm-Up Without External Load Improves the Chest Pass Distance in Female Basketball Players.

International journal of exercise science·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test

Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test

Published on: July 27, 2015

Determining MAOD Using a Single Exhaustive Severe Intensity Test.

José R Valenzuela¹, Andrea E Riojas¹, Brian K McFARLIN^1,2

¹Department of Kinesiology, Health Promotion, and Recreation, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA.

International Journal of Exercise Science

|June 9, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Measuring anaerobic capacity can be simplified. A new method using post-exercise phosphocreatine and glycolytic contributions correlates highly with Maximal Accumulated Oxygen Deficit (MAOD), offering a faster alternative.

Keywords:

Energy demand creatine phosphate cycling

More Related Videos

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans

Published on: December 11, 2016

Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients

Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients

Published on: April 12, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 19, 2025

Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test

Determining The Electromyographic Fatigue Threshold Following a Single Visit Exercise Test

Published on: July 27, 2015

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans

Induction and Assessment of Exertional Skeletal Muscle Damage in Humans

Published on: December 11, 2016

Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients

Manual Muscle Testing: A Method of Measuring Extremity Muscle Strength Applied to Critically Ill Patients

Published on: April 12, 2011

Area of Science:

Exercise Physiology
Sports Science
Human Performance

Background:

Maximal Accumulated Oxygen Deficit (MAOD) is a key indicator of anaerobic capacity.
Current MAOD measurement protocols are time-intensive and involve complex assumptions.
There is a need for more efficient and less demanding methods to assess anaerobic capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

To evaluate an alternative method for measuring anaerobic capacity.
To assess if post-exercise phosphocreatine and glycolytic contributions can replace MAOD.
To determine the validity of a simplified anaerobic capacity assessment.

Main Methods:

Participants (12 women, 8 men) underwent cycle ergometer tests to exhaustion (~4 and ~8 minutes).
Anaerobic capacity was measured using both MAOD and the sum of phosphocreatine and glycolytic contributions (PCr+glycolysis).
MAOD was calculated via oxygen uptake subtraction; PCr+glycolysis from post-exercise VO2 and blood lactate.

Main Results:

MAOD and PCr+glycolysis values for both 4-min and 8-min tests were highly correlated (r ≥ 0.91).
No significant differences were found between MAOD and PCr+glycolysis measurements.
Both methods yielded comparable results for anaerobic capacity estimation.

Conclusions:

Post-exercise measures of phosphocreatine and glycolytic contributions provide a valid alternative to MAOD.
This simplified approach offers a time-efficient method for quantifying anaerobic capacity.
The findings support a more accessible assessment of anaerobic fitness in athletes and researchers.