Accurate determination of node and arc multiplicities in de bruijn graphs using conditional random fields
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 9, 2025

Automatic Identification of Dendritic Branches and their Orientation
Published on: September 17, 2021
Aranka Steyaert1, Pieter Audenaert1, Jan Fostier2
1Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-imec, IDLab, Ghent, B-9052, Belgium.
Background:
De Bruijn graphs are key data structures for the analysis of next-generation sequencing data. They efficiently represent the overlap between reads and hence, also the underlying genome sequence. However, sequencing errors and repeated subsequences render the identification of the true underlying sequence difficult. A key step in this process is the inference of the multiplicities of nodes and arcs in the graph. These multiplicities correspond to the number of times each k-mer (resp. k+1-mer) implied by a node (resp. arc) is present in the genomic sequence. Determining multiplicities thus reveals the repeat structure and presence of sequencing errors. Multiplicities of nodes/arcs in the de Bruijn graph are reflected in their coverage, however, coverage variability and coverage biases render their determination ambiguous. Current methods to determine node/arc multiplicities base their decisions solely on the information in nodes and arcs individually, under-utilising the information present in the sequencing data.
Results:
To improve the accuracy with which node and arc multiplicities in a de Bruijn graph are inferred, we developed a conditional random field (CRF) model to efficiently combine the coverage information within each node/arc individually with the information of surrounding nodes and arcs. Multiplicities are thus collectively assigned in a more consistent manner.
Conclusions:
We demonstrate that the CRF model yields significant improvements in accuracy and a more robust expectation-maximisation parameter estimation. True k-mers can be distinguished from erroneous k-mers with a higher F1 score than existing methods. A C++11 implementation is available at https://github.com/biointec/detox under the GNU AGPL v3.0 license.
More Related Videos
07:13Quantitative Analysis of Neuronal Dendritic Arborization Complexity in Drosophila
Published on: January 7, 2019
12:27Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
Published on: February 15, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Vector Algebra: Graphical Method
We use the laws of geometry to construct resultant vectors, followed by trigonometry to find vector magnitudes and directions. For a geometric construction of the sum of two vectors in a plane, we follow the parallelogram rule. Suppose two vectors are at arbitrary positions. Translate either one of...
Node Analysis for AC Circuits
To unravel the complexities of this system, nodal analysis is employed, a powerful technique founded on Kirchhoff's current law (KCL), which remains valid for phasors. AC circuits can effectively be...
Nodal Analysis
Consider, for instance, a simple circuit composed of three nodes and three resistors, as shown in...
Determination of Expected Frequency
Probability Distributions
A discrete probability distribution is a probability distribution of discrete random variables. It can be categorized into binomial probability distribution and Poisson...
Random Variables
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...