Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 5, 2025

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Comparing Injectable DaxibotulinumtoxinA and OnabotulinumtoxinA in Moderate and Severe Glabellar Lines: Additional
Vince Bertucci1, Shannon Humphrey, Jean Carruthers
1*Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Departments of †Dermatology and Skin Science, and ‡Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; §Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; ‖Dermetics, Burlington, Ontario, Canada; ¶The Westmount Institute of Plastic Surgery, Montreal, Québec, Canada; #Clinical Development Department, Revance Therapeutics, Inc., Newark, California; **Write on Target Ltd., Leighton Buzzard, United Kingdom.
DaxibotulinumtoxinA (RT002) shows efficacy in treating glabellar lines, with a 40U dose offering a longer duration of response compared to onabotulinumtoxinA. This benefit is observed in both moderate and severe lines.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Dermatology
- Aesthetics
Background:
- DaxibotulinumtoxinA (RT002) is an investigational botulinum toxin Type A.
- Phase 2 data indicate 40U daxibotulinumtoxinA offers greater response rates and longer duration (median 24 weeks) than 20U onabotulinumtoxinA, with a favorable safety profile.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess if baseline glabellar line severity influences the efficacy and safety of daxibotulinumtoxinA.
- To compare daxibotulinumtoxinA with onabotulinumtoxinA across different severity levels of glabellar lines.
Main Methods:
- A Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study.
- Participants with moderate or severe glabellar lines received 20U, 40U, or 60U daxibotulinumtoxinA, 20U onabotulinumtoxinA, or placebo.
- Investigator-assessed efficacy was monitored for at least 24 weeks.
Main Results:
- Analysis of the per-protocol population (n=191) stratified by baseline severity (125 moderate, 66 severe).
- The clinical advantage of 40U daxibotulinumtoxinA over 20U onabotulinumtoxinA was maintained across various efficacy outcomes in both moderate and severe glabellar lines.
- Statistical evaluations were limited by subgroup size.
Conclusions:
- 40U daxibotulinumtoxinA demonstrates a clinical efficacy advantage over 20U onabotulinumtoxinA for both moderate and severe glabellar lines.
- A greater advantage was observed in patients with severe glabellar lines.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Repetitive IV Injections
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

