Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Feedback control systems01:26

Feedback control systems

585
Feedback control systems are categorized in various ways based on their design, analysis, and signal types.
Linear feedback systems are theoretical models that simplify analysis and design. These systems operate under the principle that their output is directly proportional to their input within certain ranges. For instance, an amplifier in a control system behaves linearly as long as the input signal remains within a specific range. However, most physical systems exhibit inherent nonlinearity...
585
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

578
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
578
PI Controller: Design01:24

PI Controller: Design

913
Proportional Integral (PI) controllers are a fundamental component in modern control systems, widely used to enhance performance and mitigate steady-state errors. They are particularly effective in applications such as automatic brightness adjustment on smartphones, where they excel at mitigating steady-state errors for step-function inputs. Unlike PD controllers, which require time-varying errors to function optimally, PI controllers leverage their integral component to address residual...
913
Open and closed-loop control systems01:17

Open and closed-loop control systems

1.4K
Control systems are foundational elements in automation and engineering. They are broadly categorized into open-loop and closed-loop systems. These classifications hinge on the presence or absence of feedback mechanisms, significantly influencing the system's performance, complexity, and application.
An open-loop control system operates without feedback from the output. It consists of two primary elements: the controller and the controlled process. The controller receives an input signal...
1.4K
Linear Approximation in Time Domain01:21

Linear Approximation in Time Domain

232
Nonlinear systems often require sophisticated approaches for accurate modeling and analysis, with state-space representation being particularly effective. This method is especially useful for systems where variables and parameters vary with time or operating conditions, such as in a simple pendulum or a translational mechanical system with nonlinear springs.
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length,...
232
PD Controller: Design01:26

PD Controller: Design

491
In automotive engineering, car suspension systems often employ Proportional Derivative (PD) controllers to enhance performance. PD controllers are utilized to adjust the damping force in response to road conditions. A controller, acting as an amplifier with a constant gain, demonstrates proportional control, with output directly mirroring input.
Designing a continuous-data controller requires selecting and linking components like adders and integrators, which are fundamental in Proportional,...
491

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predictive value of the domain specific PLA2R antibodies for clinical remission in patients with primary membranous nephropathy: A retrospective study.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Transthoracic ultrasound localization microscopy of myocardial vasculature in patients.

Nature biomedical engineering·2024
Same author

Ultrafast 3-D Transcutaneous Super Resolution Ultrasound Using Row-Column Array Specific Coherence-Based Beamforming and Rolling Acoustic Sub-aperture Processing: In Vitro, in Rabbit and in Human Study.

Ultrasound in medicine & biology·2024
Same author

Long-term expandable mouse and human-induced nephron progenitor cells enable kidney organoid maturation and modeling of plasticity and disease.

Cell stem cell·2024
Same author

Data-Driven Dynamic Internal Model Control.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2024
Same author

Assessment of rainfall-derived inflow and infiltration in sewer systems with machine learning approaches.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2024
Same journal

An Evolutionary Algorithm Assisted by an Ensemble of Pareto-Optimal Surrogate Models.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Quantum Self-Attention Neural Network Model on Quantum Circuits.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Semi-Explicit Solution of Some Discrete-Time Higher-Order-Cost Mean-Field-Type Control.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

A Novel One-Step Small Object Detector for Autonomous Aerial Vehicles.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Online Data-Driven-Based Optimal Output Tracking Control Without Initial Stabilizing Policy.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
Same journal

Digital Redesign-Based Interval State Estimation for Continuous Systems With Aperiodic Discrete Measurements.

IEEE transactions on cybernetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 4, 2025

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
08:27

Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: October 28, 2021

3.1K

Quantitative Data-Driven Adaptive Iterative Learning Control: From Trajectory Tracking to Point-to-Point Tracking.

Ronghu Chi, Huimin Zhang, Biao Huang

    IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
    |October 23, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This article presents new methods for controlling complex, nonlinear systems using limited, quantized data. By creating a mathematical model that learns from previous attempts, the researchers improve how machines track specific paths or reach target points. The approach adjusts to uncertainties and handles data constraints more effectively than older techniques.

    Keywords:
    control theorydata-driven modelingadaptive controltracking performance

    Frequently Asked Questions

    More Related Videos

    A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
    10:16

    A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

    Published on: January 3, 2018

    15.2K
    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
    08:16

    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

    Published on: January 17, 2013

    13.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 4, 2025

    Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation
    08:27

    Three-Dimensional Finger Motion Tracking during Needling: A Solution for the Kinematic Analysis of Acupuncture Manipulation

    Published on: October 28, 2021

    3.1K
    A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
    10:16

    A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

    Published on: January 3, 2018

    15.2K
    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
    08:16

    Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

    Published on: January 17, 2013

    13.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Control systems engineering within iterative learning control
    • Computational intelligence and data-driven modeling

    Background:

    No prior work had fully resolved the challenges posed by quantized data within iterative learning control for nonlinear nonaffine systems. That uncertainty drove researchers to examine how limited information impacts tracking performance. Prior research has shown that traditional control methods often struggle when data precision is restricted. This gap motivated a comprehensive re-evaluation of how such systems process feedback. Existing frameworks frequently ignore the potential benefits of utilizing past control knowledge. Previous studies often failed to integrate adaptive mechanisms capable of handling system uncertainties effectively. That limitation hindered the development of robust controllers for complex, non-linear environments. The current investigation addresses these deficiencies by proposing a novel data-driven approach.

    Purpose Of The Study:

    The aim of this study is to reconsider the data quantization problem in iterative learning control for nonlinear nonaffine systems. Researchers seek to address four specific aspects, including the use of available control knowledge and different tracking tasks. They also intend to improve adaptation to uncertainties through a new data-driven design framework. The study addresses the challenge of limited data precision in complex control environments. By developing a quantitative data-driven adaptive iterative learning control, the authors hope to enhance performance. They also aim to extend these concepts to multi-intermediate-point tracking tasks using partial measurements. The motivation stems from the need for more robust controllers that can handle coupled dynamics effectively. This work provides a systematic approach to overcoming constraints that limit traditional tracking methods.

    Main Methods:

    The review approach involves establishing an iterative linear data model to represent complex system dynamics. Investigators utilize this model to design a quantitative data-driven adaptive control algorithm. They incorporate an adaptive updating law to estimate parameters and adjust learning gains dynamically. The team employs a double-dynamics analysis method to evaluate the convergence of tracking errors. Researchers compare the performance of trajectory-based tracking against a specialized point-to-point tracking variant. They utilize simulation examples to validate the theoretical framework under various operational conditions. The methodology focuses on integrating quantized measurements to improve control precision. This systematic design ensures that the controller remains robust despite the presence of significant system uncertainties.

    Main Results:

    The strongest finding indicates that the point-to-point tracking variant outperforms the standard trajectory-based controller for multi-intermediate-point tasks. This improvement occurs because the new method successfully removes unnecessary constraints during the learning process. The researchers established an iterative linear data model that effectively represents nonlinear nonaffine systems for subsequent analysis. Their adaptive updating law allows for adjustable learning gains, which directly improves robustness to system uncertainties. The double-dynamics analysis method confirms error convergence by accounting for coupled dynamics among inputs and tracking errors. Simulation results verify that utilizing additional input information from previous time instants enhances overall control performance. The study demonstrates that quantized measurements can be effectively used to achieve precise tracking at specified instants. These results confirm that the proposed framework provides a flexible and reliable solution for complex tracking requirements.

    Conclusions:

    The authors propose that their iterative linear data model provides a robust foundation for analyzing complex nonaffine systems. They suggest that utilizing quantized tracking errors allows for improved control performance by incorporating past input information. The researchers claim that their adaptive updating law enhances system robustness against various uncertainties. They demonstrate that the double-dynamics analysis method effectively proves error convergence for these coupled systems. The study indicates that the point-to-point tracking variant offers superior performance for multi-intermediate-point tasks. The authors conclude that removing unnecessary constraints significantly benefits the accuracy of target-based tracking. They maintain that their framework successfully bridges the gap between trajectory tracking and specific point-to-point requirements. The findings confirm that these quantitative methods provide a reliable alternative to traditional non-quantized control strategies.

    The researchers propose a double-dynamics analysis method alongside the contraction mapping principle. This approach accounts for the coupled dynamics between system inputs and tracking errors, ensuring that the learning process converges reliably even when data is quantized.

    The iterative linear data model serves as the primary mathematical representation. It allows the system to approximate nonlinear nonaffine dynamics, facilitating the design of control algorithms that function effectively within a data-driven environment.

    The authors argue that utilizing information from previous time instants is necessary to improve performance. By incorporating this historical input data, the controller can better adjust to the specific constraints of quantized measurements.

    Quantized tracking errors provide the primary feedback for the adaptive learning process. These measurements allow the controller to adjust gains dynamically, which helps maintain stability and accuracy despite the limitations of the data.

    The researchers measure the effectiveness of their approach by comparing trajectory tracking against multi-intermediate-point tracking. They observe that the point-to-point variant outperforms the standard version by eliminating unnecessary constraints during complex tasks.

    The authors claim that their framework successfully transitions from simple trajectory tracking to complex point-to-point tasks. They suggest this flexibility allows for broader applications in systems where only partial measurements are available at specific intervals.