Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

42.5K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
42.5K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

31.1K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
31.1K
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation01:12

Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation

120
Strategic self-presentation refers to individuals' intentional efforts to influence how others perceive them. This process is employed in various social and professional settings, such as job interviews, dating, politics, and legal contexts, where individuals seek to shape impressions to gain social or material advantages. While people generally present themselves in ways that align with their authentic characteristics, external factors, such as cognitive load, can hinder their ability to...
120
Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals01:30

Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals

181
The actions and characteristics of others heavily influence the causes of social behaviors. Emotional expressions serve as powerful social signals, shaping behaviors and interactions in significant ways. Whether through direct observation or subconscious processing, individuals constantly adjust their responses based on the emotions and attributes of those around them.Emotional Cues and Social ResponsesFacial expressions, tone of voice, and body language provide crucial emotional cues that...
181
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other01:20

Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other

139
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
139
Conformity01:20

Conformity

47.4K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
47.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Citation penalties following sexual versus scientific misconduct allegations.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Choices without preferences: Principles of rational arbitrariness.

Psychological review·2025
Same author

Incomplete preferences and rational framing effects.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2022
Same author

Is it a judgment of representativeness? Re-examining the birth sequence problem.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2022
Same author

Sensitivity to shifts in probability of harm and benefit in moral dilemmas.

Cognition·2021
Same author

Exploiting asymmetric signals from choices through default selection.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2020
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
05:03

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.7K

Default sensitivity in attempts at social influence.

Craig R M McKenzie1,2, Lim M Leong3, Shlomi Sher4

  • 1Rady School of Management, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093-0553, USA. cmckenzie@ucsd.edu.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|November 3, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

People can strategically set defaults to influence choices, contrary to previous findings of "default neglect." Simplified tasks and framing reveal an ability to optimize defaults for social influence.

Keywords:
Choice architectureDecision makingDefault effectNudge

More Related Videos

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.2K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research
05:03

Author Spotlight: Unveiling Mechanisms of Stress Resilience - Significant Findings, Advancements, and Future Research

Published on: December 15, 2023

4.7K
The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
11:13

The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test

Published on: November 19, 2015

14.2K
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.3K

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Economics
  • Social Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Defaults powerfully influence decision-making, but understanding of strategic default setting is limited.
  • Prior research indicated
  • default neglect,
  • suggesting people fail to set optimal defaults.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether people understand how to strategically set defaults to influence others' choices.
  • To challenge the generalizability of prior findings on default neglect.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted experiments using simple scenarios to assess default setting ability.
  • Performed direct and conceptual replications of previous studies, manipulating task complexity and framing.

Main Results:

  • Participants successfully set optimal defaults in simplified scenarios (Experiments 1A, 1B).
  • A conceptual replication with a simplified task reversed previous findings of below-chance performance.
  • Framing of option attributes significantly impacted default setting performance (Experiment 3).

Conclusions:

  • The observed
  • default neglect
  • may be specific to complex experimental paradigms.
  • People demonstrate a capacity for setting optimal defaults when attempting social influence.
  • Task design and framing are critical factors in default setting effectiveness.