Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.7K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.7K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

467
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
467

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Everyday decision-making in later life: the role of cognitive reserve and cognitive functions.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Reliability of Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements Across Scan Protocols in Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Integration of retinal layer thinning into NEDA-3 predicts disability progression in multiple sclerosis.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Shortened olfactory identification testing to differentiate parkinsonian syndromes.

Parkinsonism & related disorders·2026
Same author

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Is Characterized by a Distinct Proteomic Profile.

Annals of neurology·2026
Same author

No interferon-beta antibodies in natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

Journal of the neurological sciences·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 26, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.4K

Decision making and framing effects in multiple sclerosis.

Laura Zamarian1, Thomas Berger1,2, Marie-Theres Pertl1

  • 1Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

European Journal of Neurology
|December 9, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) gather information effectively but make more irrational decisions and are swayed by framing. This highlights the need for careful communication with MS patients.

Keywords:
executive functionslogistic modelsneuropsychological testsrelapsing-remittingrisk taking

More Related Videos

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.4K
Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice
05:44

Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 26, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.4K
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla
08:51

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis at 7.0 Tesla

Published on: February 19, 2021

9.4K
Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice
05:44

Author Spotlight: Creating a Versatile Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis Model Relevant for Both Male and Female Mice

Published on: October 13, 2023

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Medical Research

Background:

  • Previous research indicates impaired decision-making in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients compared to healthy controls (HC).
  • This study investigates whether decision-making deficits in MS stem from information sampling or evidence evaluation.
  • Understanding these deficits is crucial for managing MS patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if multiple sclerosis (MS) patients exhibit difficulties in information sampling or in evaluating collected evidence during decision-making.
  • To assess the impact of framing effects on decision-making in MS patients.
  • To identify potential communication strategies for healthcare providers interacting with MS patients.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional, controlled study involving 43 relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients and 53 HC.
  • Participants completed an information sampling task (beads task) and a health-related framing task.
  • Neuropsychological background tests were administered to all participants.

Main Results:

  • MS patients collected information similarly to HC but made irrational decisions twice as often (60% vs. 30%).
  • Patients with MS demonstrated a significantly stronger framing effect than HC, indicating greater bias from information presentation.
  • The framing effect was a significant predictor of irrational decision-making in all participants.

Conclusions:

  • Information sampling processes appear intact in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients.
  • RRMS patients are more prone to making irrational decisions and are more susceptible to framing biases compared to HC.
  • Findings underscore the importance of cautious and clear communication, particularly in medical contexts, when interacting with MS patients.