Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 13, 2026

09:17
Using Retinal Imaging to Study Dementia
Published on: November 6, 2017
Reliability of Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Measurements Across Scan Protocols in
Nik Krajnc1,2, Martin Bertich3, Fabian Föttinger1,2
1Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
|June 12, 2026
Summary
Modified optical coherence tomography (OCT) acquisition parameters show excellent reliability for ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness measurements. The high-lines protocol offers the best balance of reliability and speed for monitoring GCIPL changes over time.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Neuroscience
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Reliable measurement of the ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thickness is crucial for monitoring neurodegenerative diseases like multiple sclerosis (MS).
- Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a key imaging modality, but acquisition parameters may influence measurement reliability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if modified OCT acquisition parameters enhance the reliability of GCIPL thickness measurements.
- To compare the test-retest reproducibility and inter-protocol agreement of different OCT scan protocols for GCIPL assessment.
Main Methods:
- Participants with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and healthy controls (HC) underwent Spectralis OCT scans using five different macular protocols (standard, high-ART, high-lines, high-resolution, maximum) at multiple time points.
- Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for inter-protocol agreement and mean absolute difference (MAD) for test-retest reproducibility.
- Acquisition time for each protocol was recorded and compared.
Main Results:
- All tested OCT protocols demonstrated excellent inter-protocol agreement (ICC 0.99) and test-retest reliability for GCIPL measurements in both PwMS and HC.
- The high-ART and high-lines protocols showed marginally lower absolute measurement variability (MAD).
- The high-lines protocol offered the most favorable balance between measurement reliability and acquisition time.
Conclusions:
- All evaluated OCT acquisition protocols provide reliable GCIPL thickness measurements.
- The high-lines protocol is recommended for longitudinal GCIPL monitoring due to its optimal combination of accuracy and efficiency.
- These findings support the use of optimized OCT protocols for precise GCIPL assessment in clinical studies and practice.

