Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 26, 2026

11:35
The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
58.9K
Assessing treatment response in multiple sclerosis
Fabian Föttinger1,2, Nik Krajnc1,2, Gabriel Bsteh1,2
1Department of Neurology.
Current Opinion in Neurology
|April 8, 2026
Summary
Monitoring multiple sclerosis (MS) requires advanced methods beyond traditional clinical assessments. Integrating imaging and fluid biomarkers with clinical evaluations improves detection of disease activity and personalizes treatment decisions for better outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Immunology
- Biomarker Research
Background:
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) management is evolving from a relapse-focused approach to understanding continuous inflammatory and neurodegenerative processes.
- Traditional clinical measures inadequately capture the full disease progression and long-term disability.
- Subtle clinical deterioration and insidious progression necessitate more sensitive monitoring strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the evolving landscape of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment response evaluation.
- To highlight the limitations of traditional clinical measures in detecting disease progression.
- To emphasize the need for integrated monitoring strategies incorporating advanced assessments.
Main Methods:
- Review of current clinical assessment tools and their limitations.
- Evaluation of advanced functional assessments for enhanced sensitivity.
- Assessment of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for detecting subclinical inflammatory activity.
- Analysis of neurodegenerative biomarkers, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluid biomarkers (serum neurofilament light chain [sNfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]).
Main Results:
- Traditional clinical measures are insufficient for detecting subtle disease progression and long-term disability.
- Enhanced functional assessments offer greater sensitivity to clinical changes.
- MRI is crucial for identifying subclinical focal inflammatory activity.
- Biomarkers like OCT, sNfL, and GFAP provide insights into diffuse neurodegenerative processes.
Conclusions:
- A personalized monitoring strategy integrating clinical assessment, imaging, and fluid biomarkers is essential for contemporary MS care.
- This integrated approach promises improved detection of subclinical disease activity.
- It enables more accurate risk stratification and informed, individualized treatment decisions.

