Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...

Nursing Evaluation

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

State of Medical Education Research in Anesthesiology: Current Landscape and Future Directions-An Initiative of the Anesthesia Research Council.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Same author

The state of medical education research in Anesthesiology: Current landscape and future directions - An initiative of the Anesthesia Research Council.

Anesthesiology·2026

Same author

Surgical Treatment of Pulmonary Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections.

Thoracic surgery clinics·2026

Same author

Integrating virtual reality and large language models for team-based non-technical skills training and evaluation in the operating room.

npj digital surgery·2026

Same author

Reflective ability in medical trainees: reliability and practicality of a measurement instrument and assessment in a large cohort.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026

Same author

Maternal cardiac arrest: a simulation-based review of anesthetic protocols and perimortem cesarean delivery.

Current opinion in anaesthesiology·2026

Same journal

Incomplete Recovery of Diaphragmatic Mechanics at a Train-of-Four Ratio of 0.90 to <0.95 Assessed by Dynamic Digital Radiography: A Proof-of-Concept Case Series.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Same journal

Patients' Perspectives and Experiences of Participating in Anesthesia Research: A Qualitative Study.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Same journal

Impact of Epidural-Related Maternal Fever on Neonatal Outcomes: A Single-Center Retrospective Case-Control Study Excluding Confirmed Histological Chorioamnionitis.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Same journal

Patient Beliefs and Experiences of Adhering to Medical Therapies for Cardiovascular Comorbidities, Before Noncardiac Elective Surgery in South Africa: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Same journal

Beyond Administrative Indices: Allostatic Load and Autonomic Dyshomeostasis as Biological Mediators of Intraoperative Cardiac Arrest.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Same journal

In Response.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

Using Machine Learning to Evaluate Attending Feedback on Resident Performance.

Sara E Neves¹, Michael J Chen¹, Cindy M Ku²

¹From the Department of Anesthesiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Anesthesia and Analgesia

|December 16, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning rapidly assesses attending feedback quality for resident performance improvement. This technology screens low-quality feedback, enhancing educational programs and faculty development.

More Related Videos

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Eye-tracking Technology and Data-mining Techniques used for a Behavioral Analysis of Adults engaged in Learning Processes

Published on: June 10, 2021

Area of Science:

Medical Education
Artificial Intelligence
Data Science

Background:

Manual assessment of feedback quality is time-consuming and subjective.
High-quality feedback is crucial for trainee development and improvement plans.
Automating feedback assessment can streamline the process for residency programs.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate machine learning models for rapid assessment of attending feedback quality.
To distinguish high-quality and high-utility feedback from low-quality and low-utility feedback.
To improve the efficiency and objectivity of feedback evaluation in residency programs.

Main Methods:

Trained machine learning models on 1925 manually reviewed feedback comments from anesthesiology residency programs.
Predicted feedback traits (actionable, behavior focused, detailed, negative, professionalism/communication, specific) and utility scores (1-5).
Classified feedback as high-quality (≥4 traits) or high-utility (≥4 utility score).

Main Results:

Models achieved 74.4%-82.2% accuracy for feedback traits.
Utility category predictions were 82.1% accurate, with 89.2% sensitivity for low-utility.
Quality category predictions were 78.5% accurate, with 86.1% sensitivity for low-quality.
Machine learning models generated predictions in minutes, compared to hours for manual review.

Conclusions:

Machine learning offers a rapid and objective method for assessing attending feedback on resident performance.
Predictive models can efficiently screen for low-quality and low-utility feedback.
This approach can significantly aid residency programs in enhancing feedback provision.